Art – Numéro Berlin https://www.numeroberlin.de Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:52:23 +0000 en-US hourly 1 ATRA X NUMÉRO BERLIN: “TIMELESS LUXURY: IN CONVERSATION WITH RENOWED DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE STUDIO ATRA” https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/02/atra-x-numero-berlin-timeless-luxury-in-conversation-with-renowed-design-and-architecture-studio-atra/ Mon, 24 Feb 2025 15:51:53 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57974

Finding balance between chaos and structure, nature and technology, taste and function: Alexander Díaz Andersson, founder of the Mexico City based design brand ATRA, fuses futuristic concepts with traditional woodworking techniques. Its modern vision of beauty embraces luxury in the context of everyday living, using organic adaptations that lead to a new design universe.

Entering the world of ATRA feels different. The first time I got to experience the
Swedish-Mexican brand founded in 2014 is last year in Paris. I am standing in their pop up showroom that is currently showing their furniture and art exhibition “CARE INSTRUCTIONS” – investigating the idea of character building for inanimate objects. It originates from the concept of how true ownership of an object comes not from the simple act of purchasing it, but from the memories made through living with it. Between noble seating objects, tables and lamps made from the most precious materials such as onyx, travertine, aged brass and alpaca, my eyes are examining the so called “SKIN”, a form-fitting, removable silicone cover tailored to ATRA’s Beluga sofas that protects its purity for everyday life while at the same time suggesting an almost experimental design aspect. It is a perfect demonstration of the brand’s core philosophy envisioning luxury furniture that should be fully experienced, appreciated, and utilized. The idea of “SKIN” originally came from Díaz Andersson’s partner Jeremiah Joseph who grew up in a place where his grandmother wrapped furniture in plastic.

At ATRA, quality, comfort and artisanal craftmanship always comes first, over any fleeting trends. The ATRA 2100 series was first showcased during the brand’s second participation in Design Miami in 2021, where it won the Best in Show prize for its “Curio” showcase. It challenges the question of how we will live 100 years from now. This forward-thinking approach highlights ATRA’s dedication to creating objects and architecture designed to endure beyond fleeting trends, emphasizing lasting significance over time. It is a beautiful homage to sustainability in the most organic way.

Another big highlight is the biohacking chair “Morphus” that the studio presents in a dark side room. It is Díaz Andersson’s collaborative work with American wellness entrepreneur Jonathan Congdon. Pulse electromagnetic frequencies with different wavelengths interact with the body, inducing deep meditative states.

The exhibition also showcases signature pieces such as an oversized BELUGA sectional sofa in black alpaca boucle and aged brass, cream-colored EGGE chairs crafted from long-hair alpaca and aged brass, PEBBLE coffee tables in white onyx and travertine, and a selection of side tables, along with various lighting and accessories.Raised in Sweden and now based in Mexico City, Alexander Díaz Andersson’s work reflects a holistic vision, aiming for a future where humanity finds balance with nature and technology, merging the physical with the ethereal. Its Architecture Studio is founded on the principle of creating architecture that is deeply informed by its geographical and cultural context, recognizing the longevity of buildings and the substantial natural resources they consume. The ATRA Studio team includes four principal architects and designers: Alexander Andersson, founder and formgivare; Leonardo Gonzales, lead conceptual architect; Bogdan Stuparu, lead architect; and Gabriella Kuti, head of interior design. Together, they bring a diverse and holistic approach to creating enduring and contextually conscious architecture.

Sina Braetz: What is your main vision behind ATRA? how are you positioning your brand differently from other international interior design brands?

Alexander Díaz Andersson: That’s a challenging question because we don’t always know precisely how other brands are positioning themselves. At ATRA, we’re more focused on questioning the longevity of design and exploring how we can create objects that not only endure but also nurture the spaces they inhabit. Design and vision are inherently subjective, but our philosophy is to craft pieces that stay relevant across trends and time. Our latest collection, “Future Relics,” is rooted in the idea of creating objects for a hypothetical future, exploring what might remain meaningful years from now. This concept started with our “2100” installation at Design Miami in 2021. Our approach is both playful and optimistic—imagining future possibilities and using that imagination to create pieces with purpose and intention. By blending contemporary design with traditional craftsmanship, we hope that our work can be a small catalyst for change, bringing a sense of nostalgia and timelessness into modern spaces.

How do you look at the changes of the interior / design scene in the past few years and where do you see the biggest future potentials for luxury design?

The interior and design scene has evolved significantly over the past few years, with a strong shift toward sustainability, authenticity, and the fusion of art and design. Consumers now seek not only functional but emotionally resonant spaces that tell a story. There’s a clear move toward handmade, limited-edition, and artisanal work, contrasting the past’s mass-produced luxury. For ATRA, this aligns with our belief in timelessness and longevity. In the future, I see the most significant potential in creating spaces and pieces that merge luxury with sustainability and technology, designing for both beauty and endurance.

Which market, countries or cities do inspire you most currently?

Inspiration often comes from cities and regions that blend rich histories with forward-thinking design approaches. Tokyo, Copenhagen, and Mexico City are particularly inspiring at the moment, with their mix of tradition and cutting-edge ideas. The convergence of art, design, and heritage in these locations resonates with ATRA’s commitment to timelessness and cultural depth.

What makes a strong interior concept? Where do you usually start?

A strong interior concept has to start with a clear narrative. For us, it’s about connecting the space to a story or an emotion we want to evoke. Usually, we begin with an anchoring theme or an iconic piece that sets the tone, building everything else around it to create a cohesive environment. This approach ensures that the interiors feel both harmonious and uniquely meaningful.

What do you consider as most important when designing furniture / interior pieces as separate entities?

When designing furniture or interior pieces, we aim to create contemporary designs that preserve traditional craftsmanship. Each piece is crafted with a focus on traditional techniques, ensuring it holds a unique identity and presence while complementing a larger space. Balancing form and function is essential; our pieces are visually striking yet practical for everyday use. By blending modern aesthetics with heritage techniques, we’re able to honor the past while pushing design forward, creating furniture that feels relevant and enduring.

How do you manage to integrate luxury concepts and sustainability?

Integrating luxury and sustainability is about selecting materials responsibly, considering lifecycle, and focusing on quality over quantity. At ATRA, we emphasize working with natural, long-lasting materials that age beautifully and using processes that reduce environmental impact. Our goal is to create luxury that feels good both aesthetically and ethically.

]]>
#ZUKUNFT: “TRANSCENDENCE AND DIVINITY: DELIA GONZALEZ” https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/02/zukunft-transcendence-and-divinity-delia-gonzalez/ Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:23:49 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57676

Delia Gonzalez’s exhibition, “Fassbinder Has Wings, Fassbinder Can Fly,” showcased at Hot Wheels Athens, serves as an exploration of divinity and the human experience within the context of prevalent technological odysseys. During a recent conversation with Gonzalez in Rome, we delved into the intricate web that connects aesthetics, our innate yearning for divinity, and our ceaseless quest to transcend the present. The exhibition sets a glamorous scene, reproducing the Athens Polytechnic interior design, as Gonzalez investigates whether these aspirations are inherently tied to our quest for higher ideals.

Delia Gonzalez is a Cuban American artist known for her multi-disciplinary approach, spanning film, sculpture, drawing, painting, choreography, dance and performance. Her artistic practice often explores themes of spirituality, identity, cinematic histories, and the interplay between the physical, mystical and metaphysical realms. Additionally, she is recognized as a musician and composer, having collaborated with artist Gavin Russom under the name “Black Leotard Front” and released music with DFA Records.

Gonzalez’s recent solo show drew inspiration from the characteristic decadence of 1970s sci-fi imagery—a vision of a grandiose future from her childhood alongside the dystopian realities depicted in films throughout that era. Her fascination with such cinematic aesthetics, particularly the slickness of 1970s science fiction, has shaped shared perceptions of our future, as well as the ongoing pursuit of technological sanctity, redefining the devotional qualities informing our present technological existence.

Her exhibition, “Fassbinder Has Wings, Fassbinder Can Fly,” was inspired by Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s film, World On A Wire, which delves into the concept of simulated reality, where advanced computer programs create virtual worlds inhabited by artificial intelligence. The protagonist, Fred Stiller, is a scientist working on a simulation project, and as he journeys deeper into the artificial world, he begins to question the nature of reality and the boundaries between the virtual and the real. Gonzalez’s interest in the film touches upon themes of the self, individuality, as well as the impact of societal reflections and repetitions on our journey towards self-discovery. Interconnected with technological development, attaining divinity is timeless and surpasses generations. For her, the potential to break free from the repetitive cycle of our reality is a complicated feat which allows her to usher in more surrealist takes grown out of such realities.

Gonzalez tells me about the surreal and recurring mimicking scenarios that she has witnessed in social situations throughout her life, where people mirror one another, sparking a dialogue on individuality, consciousness, and the profound impact of technology, specifically, AI. She introduces an inescapable metaphor—the mirror—as an insignia of human behavior, denoting a conformity of emulation.

Enacting simulation is intrinsic to human behavior, Gonzalez explains to me, and the synchronous influence that AI evokes is just a technological resolution of understanding the self as a copy of another. For this exhibition, Gonzalez also introduces the idea of the mirror as a symbol of human behavior: how humans often mimic and mirror each other, raising questions about individuality and consciousness as they correlate with technology. She is interested in whether modern technology and AI are pushing us towards a cycle of repetition, ultimately leading humanity back to a position where something begins, arises, or is derived from—a repetitive copy of itself in an object-like imitation of a situation or process.

This can be understood as a feedback loop, helping us to understand complex systems of pattern recognition outcomes and how such patterns might shape the processes of human behavior in the future. A feedback loop is a system or process where the output or result of a particular action or behavior is fed back into the system as input, influencing or modifying subsequent actions or behaviors. In simpler terms, it is a self-regulating mechanism where the consequences of an action affect future iterations of that action. While mirroring alludes to self-awareness, introspection, or illusion, feedback loops describe self-regulation, self-correction, or patterns in complex systems.

In a world shaped by technology masquerading as artificial intelligence, the concept of divinity takes on new dimensions. Are we headed towards a higher understanding of ourselves, or are we losing touch with the spiritual realm? Is divinity a purely spiritual concept, or does it also entail a connection to a higher power? This interplay between divinity, AI, technology, and human existence underpinned by the allure and significance of aesthetics, perfection, and a longing for the past in shaping our perceptions of the future is evident throughout Gonzalez’s work. Gonzalez provocatively questions whether we are moving closer to divinity or losing touch with it. She touches upon themes of the self, individuality, as well as the impact of societal reflections of futurity and repetitions in the journey towards self-discovery.

Delia Gonzalez incorporates a digitally rendered and synthy soundscape of two similar sounding tracks that play alongside the formica replicas of the Polytechnic Athens’ interior structures, encapsulating the mood of the lobby’s design located just across the road from the gallery. This sort of mirroring blurs the boundaries between capturing a nostalgic, idealized vision of the future reminiscent of the glitzy 1970s films like Fassbinder’s  “World on a Wire.” The allure of glamor and perfection are reiterated in this show, prompting contemplation as to whether these aspirations are intrinsically tied to our quest for higher ideals.  “Fassbinder Has Wings, Fassbinder Can Fly” explores the essence of transcendence and divinity in Gonzalez’s symbolic use of the mirror, constellated as panel-portals throughout the installation, and its imposing role in our relentless pursuit for power and self-reflection in the digital age. At its most basic understanding, the human characteristics that we ascribe to technology.

]]>
#ZUKUNFT: IN CONVERSATION WITH COOKING SECTIONS https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/02/zukunft-in-conversation-with-cooking-sections/ Fri, 14 Feb 2025 09:22:14 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57587

Artist duo Cooking Sections’ work combines art and activism, using food as a gateway to explore the social, cultural and political drivers of the climate crisis. Founded in 2012 by Daniel Fernández Pascual and Alon Schwabe, Cooking Sections incorporates design, architecture and community work to create works that defy simple categorization. In their multi-site project CLIMAVORE, they examine how climate change has eliminated traditional seasons, instead identifying the new ‘seasons’ of the climate crises: periods of drought, oceanic pollution and soil depletion. Yet their work also explores potential solutions, looking at how we can create adaptive and regenerative forms of food production. Thus, rather than just working with temporary installations, their practice actively seeks to create frameworks that can be continued in a local context after an exhibition is over. This incorporated solution aspect offers a much-needed glimmer of optimism in a struggle where many of us can find ourselves feeling powerless. Their work is not about the individual choices we make, but about facing the structural issues that are accelerating the climate emergency, and encourage us to demand change by those in power.

Johanne Björklund Larsen: The term ‘climavore’ frequently appears in your practice. Could you tell me a bit more about it?

Cooking Sections: It’s a term we coined in 2015 to think of different systems and how to use food to understand them. We use food to understand those systems and how they are adapting to the new seasons of the climate crisis. It starts from the idea that the seasons that we grew up with have become or are becoming more and more obsolete. For example, when you go to the supermarket, you find pretty much anything all year round because of these standardized and intensive ways of producing food. So we started thinking about what it would mean to eat according to the new seasons that are being generated by humans because of the industrialization of the world. Like a season of drought or a season of polluted oceans or a season of flash floods. And that’s when we started thinking of these possible ingredients, variations that on the one hand are becoming more common in places they were not before, but at the same time also possible scenarios we can imagine to address them.

“Too often, the responsibility of a malfunctioning of a system is put on people’s individual habits instead of thinking more systemically.”
JBL: It’s a common saying that food brings people together. What do you think is the power that food holds?

CS: Well, I think for us, more than the convivial aspect – which is also important for us – it is more about how to think of food as an infrastructure, especially thinking about systemic change at the levels of governance as well as policy-making and how to bring different allies into these struggles towards food justice. And to do that, we like to operate at different levels. Of course, people get together to eat and it’s very important. But even if that sometimes becomes part of our work, the focus is more on infrastructural change that doesn’t stay at the level of the individual. Too often, the responsibility of a malfunctioning of a system is put on people’s individual habits instead of thinking more systemically. For example, why are food corporations allowed to use certain pesticides and then make people pay three times more in the supermarket for food that doesn’t have those chemicals or poison? We want to put more emphasis on those layers, not only on the conviviality of people getting together and eating nice food.

JBL: Food inhabits this interesting duality. It is something we all engage with and for most of us, it has strong emotional connections. Yet, at the same time, it is also an extremely polarized subject. What do you think of this connection between the two? And do you think that this duality is why it’s such an effective platform for discussing these issues?

CS: It has also been made polarized, right? People grew up with it for centuries and it was something very embedded in everyday life. But because of the industrialization of food, especially after the Second World War, more and more people have become disconnected from food and food has become more disconnected from landscapes and the natural seasons because of different so-called technological modernizations. But that has also created a whole series of problems. And that’s where we think this divide appeared. It has become really politicized and, actually, should be even more politicized because it’s a real struggle. Food production is now driven by corporate profit, like many other extractive industries in the world. There is that gap that needs to be bridged. And it’s not easy.

JBL: Another thing I think is really interesting with your work, is that you bring up issues that a lot of people might not at first think of as food-related, such as decreasing fertility rates. Why do you think art is an effective tool for highlighting these connections?

CS: For us, it’s important to use cultural platforms to, on the one hand, raise awareness about these connections, while it is also very important to imagine a new, possible future. We need to start thinking about how we can end some of these extractive practices or toxic ways of farming. And to do that, we need to imagine better worlds. Which is what we try to do in our work, to pick some of these cases or stories from our research and then amplify them. For instance, one particular case is the whole body of work around farmed salmon and the synthetic colors that are used to pigment the flesh of the fish. The fish are grown in intensive farms underwater and because of deficiencies in their industrialized diet, their flesh doesn’t turn pink, the way people expect them to look. So, artificial coloring is used to compensate for it. In this particular case, we use the illusion of color to expose and reveal how the production of farmed fish creates serious new problems. It is not just an aesthetic problem in terms of color, but that fake color that is illustrative of the problem with the entire system.

“In order to make food affordable and to feed the world, some of these very intensive and toxic practices have been heavily subsidized by governments without thinking of the long-term future of the soil or the long-term future of our bodies.”
JBL: With the increase of industrialized food production, we have also somehow moved ourselves further and further away from nature and the climate, leading us to the current toxic spiral we are finding ourselves in. Do you think using food is an effective way of reconnecting with nature?

CS: Definitely. But we first need to understand that we’ve been forced to disconnect. Because people were not disconnected that long ago. We need to think of the externalities. In order to make food affordable and to feed the world, some of these very intensive and toxic practices have been heavily subsidized by governments without thinking of the long-term future of the soil or the long-term future of our bodies. [Our bodies] are becoming increasingly infertile because of exposure to some of the pesticides that are used in to lower the costs of the production of food. So, at what cost does cheap food actually come, at what cost to the environment, at what cost to our bodies? At the moment, cheap food is cheap because of these subsidies to corporate profit-oriented enterprises, but also because it doesn’t take into account the long-term effects and who is doing what with those externalities. If you were to include the price of cleaning the waterways from pesticides, would it be that cheap then? The problem is that those costs are not included in the price of food. For us, it’s about making these connections visible. It’s not people deciding to disconnect from food, it is enterprises that have been severing those connections.

JBL: Do you see any positive changes on a broader scale, food and agricultural-wise?

CS: Yes, of course. There are a lot of farmers that are doing incredible work in many parts of the world, who try to resist those corporate structures and still take care of the land and the soil for future generations. And there’s a lot of initiatives. I think the problem sometimes is that they feel that society demands a lot from them in terms of ecology, but no one is really supporting them in the way that some of these more industrialized food production systems are subsidized. So, on the one hand, they have to bear the risks of failure because sometimes the weather doesn’t help, especially if you don’t use chemicals to mitigate. And, on the other hand, it’s a social responsibility they feel that people demand from them. That is a huge psychological load to carry. There needs to be more support for long-term visions and for food production that takes care of both humans and the soil.

JBL: What do you think would be ways of supporting farmers like this, both on a bigger scale and on a more personal level?

CS: Demanding more infrastructural change. Governments should support, for instance, open source seeds without copyright or patents by multinational corporations so that farmers don’t need to pay for seeds that are climate resilient. We need to have open source seeds for farmers so they can decide on their future and what they want to grow without paying because that’s how humanity has always been. Another infrastructural change we need to demand from government: Think of when we go to the supermarket. We are put in a personal quandary and a financial bind, where we have to choose if we want to pay three times more not to be poisoned, instead of the government just banning these pesticides from the start. These kinds of choices are then up to people’s habits and the information they have instead of governments and corporations taking the responsibility.

JBL: It’s horrible because it becomes a class question if you can afford to not poison yourself.

CS: Exactly.

JBL: Your work lies in the intersection of art, food and agriculture. It’s a combination that is not very common. Why do you think that is?

CS: It’s hard to say… We just believe in the work we are interested in and it doesn’t have to do with being more or less common. We love allies. We’d like to have more allies and people do it more at work. But yeah, there are many issues in the world and each one focuses inwards.

JBL: What do you think the food of the future will look and taste like?

CS: We’ve been working a lot within the climate framework and thinking about the future seasons. For instance, in a season of drought and there is a lack of water or water scarcity, let’s think of more drought-resistant crops. Or if there is a season of soil exhaustion because so many chemicals have been applied that the soil is dead, what kinds of rotation of crops can nourish the soil in the same way that we nourish our bodies? These are the kinds of ingredients we try to find, but we also look at ways of growing them that support ecological systems, not just addressing the ingredients themselves.

JBL: What are some examples of these ingredients and food that you see becoming more common in the future?

CS: We need to familiarize ourselves with the local plants that are available. For example, in the south of Italy, there are all of these wild plants, nut trees and varieties of vegetables that don’t require irrigation. So, on the one hand, familiarize ourselves with them, and then create a demand.

JBL: Are there any useful or environmentally friendly ingredients that most of us are not aware of that you think should get more attention?

CS: Again, that depends on where you live and where you are. For example, on the Isle of Skye in Scotland, where we did the project on farmed salmon, we’ve been working a lot with alternative aquaculture, mainly oysters, mussels and seaweeds that contribute to oxygenated water as they grow. Seaweed, for instance, is an ingredient that in Scotland had been used for generations but has been forgotten, especially since industrialized food production started after the Second World War. We look at how to recover some of these cultural legacies for the sake of history, but also as foods for the future. They are incredible sources of protein and many other compounds that our bodies need, but have been disregarded. So, it is crucial to reconnect with these ingredients, but it all depends on where you live and what the main issue at stake is. For example, if you live on the coast and you have fish farms nearby, how can you transition to alternative aquaculture? If you’re in an area that is experiencing increasing drought, how can you grow vegetables that do not require irrigation? And so on.

JBL: We’ve talked about the big structural changes that need to happen for a sustainable future. But do you have any advice for change that people can implement on an individual level? Because I think a lot of people are looking for ways to have a positive impact but don’t really know where to start and what to do.

CS: What we can do is to ask questions, ask yourself why is this available? Why is this not available? It’s a lot about information and talking to people and thinking. For example, if you are in a dry environment affected by drought, look at why there are not so many ingredients that respond to drought. Because the moment you start pulling the thread and tracing it, then you understand all the actors that are involved, and then you can demand change. It’s not easy to do it on an individual level. But, we have to because it’s our everyday life and we need to constantly make good choices. And there is a lot of work to be done on a wider, infrastructure level.

]]>
#ZUKUNFT: “IS THE BED HALF FULL OR HALF EMPTY?” IN CONVERSATION WITH CHRISTOPHER HARTMANN https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/02/zukunft-is-the-bed-half-full-or-half-empty-in-conversation-with-christopher-hartmann/ Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:00:52 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57560 “Just because a bed is empty, doesn’t mean it can’t be filled with longing.”

The creased and draped linens in Christopher Hartmann’s most recent show at Blum and Poe Gallery in Los Angeles use human imprints rather than the figures themselves to tell stories and play with the idea of opposites. The 30-year-old artist dives into domestic messes, using piles of clothes like a Rorschach test and celebrating the joy of four white socks peeking out from under a duvet. Catching up with the artist on his way back to London, Hartmann speaks on longing, belonging and growing into subtlety.

Angela Waters: Fabrics play a large role across your Nightswimming exhibition, how did your eye turn towards textiles?

Christopher Hartmann: The initial starting point was the first lockdown in 2020. My previous work was very figure-heavy, about flesh and skin. All my work is staged to a certain degree, I take photographs before I paint. During the lockdown, I wasn’t able or allowed to take images of people, that’s when I became more interested in clothes and suggesting a certain presence through the absence of figures. I was staring at a pile of clothes at home and noticed the movement of the fabrics and impression of the body.

The first room in my exhibition is just empty bed sheets, empty beds — what I am most interested in is the absence of the body, to suggest with an imprint of a body that a body was there. With the fabrics, it creates a different type or relationship between the paintings and the viewer. Through the fabrics and textiles, the viewer can interpret the motif I am portraying through their own experience.

Although you portray a lot of empty rooms, they are always very lived in, verging on messy, with unmade beds and piles of rumpled clothing. Do you identify as a messy person?

I am a controlled messy person. Not to reinforce stereotypes, but I’m a typical Capricorn, and on top of that I am German — always in control. My studio can get messy sometimes, but I have it under control. At a certain point, I have to clean. I also don’t mind mess, as long as it is my mess and I have some kind of overview of it, but if it is somebody else’s mess, I do get a bit crazy about it.

The pile of clothes I paint are very staged and composed – I spend hours on them. Some of my scenes are more natural states, but they exist in a place between staged and natural. Very often, a still life starts with me seeing something on the floor or on the couch. I then take a few pictures and start to remove or add something to make an interesting composition. I am aware that the end goal is painting.

When you do paint figures, it is most often men. Is there a reason behind it, or a particular stance you have on the subject?

As a man, it feels like the most authentic thing I can do: paint men and show things from my perspective. If you had asked me three or four years ago, I would have told you that my work is a reflection of my belief that there aren’t any fixed ideas of masculinity, but in 2023, I don’t think so much about gender norms.

There is a certain vulnerability and tenderness to the paintings, which is in contrast to a traditional sense of masculinity — but it’s not a groundbreaking new idea. For me, tenderness, vulnerability and masculinity go hand in hand. These aspects are intrinsically human, regardless of gender, sex or whatever. It is the way I am and how I relate to people in my life.

“I had just moved into a new flat in London and the starting point of that was me just staring into an empty bed. The idea of starting over was heartbreaking.”
You said that you’ve had a shift in thinking when it comes to proactively using your work to make a statement on masculinity. Do you think you’ve changed, or your environment?

Obviously, I can’t separate myself from my environment. I grew up in Bavaria, in an ultra-Catholic environment, so I am aware of the traditional view of masculinity. But maybe it is tied to leaving home. Sometimes I wonder if I am in a bubble, living in London, in the art world, thinking that people are very openminded and less fixated on certain ideas.

With this shift in thinking, how has the change manifested in your work?

Five years ago, I was pushing ideas of sexuality and masculinity. But now, my work has become a bit more supple and tender. Maybe this also has to do with age. There is something about the subtleness that I find more interesting, showing more, but being less explicit.

My most recent work in LA was about longing and belonging and exploring the idea of home. I had just moved into a new flat in London and the starting point of that was me just staring into an empty bed. The idea of starting over was heartbreaking. I was staring at the bed and thinking about where you sleep at night and where you define your home.

Now, I am much more interested in abstraction. Instead of painting a person who looks nostalgic or painting a fleshy intimate scene, I am interested in depicting atmospheres that express nostalgia or show an intimate state of mind.

Still, if abstraction helps portray emotional concepts, do you still have use for flesh and people in your paintings?

I am interested in that duality — absence points towards a presence and a presence points towards an absence. Each provokes something different in the viewer. You can very much relate to an empty bed, and it can be very confronting, but two figures are much more explicit, much more specific, and about interpretations of the poses and action. But I like telling stories across this juxtaposition.

]]>
REINE PARADIS: “ECLIPSE” AT KÖNIG GALERIE https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/01/reine-paradis-eclipse-at-konig-galerie/ Fri, 31 Jan 2025 14:47:49 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57152

LA-based artist Reine Paradis (b. 1989, France) will soon be coming to Berlin to present her newest body of work “ECLIPSE”. Her practice is strongly characterised by bold colors and sharp compositions, and applies a wide array of media. By use of self-portrait photography, painting, sculpture, installation, and video, the artist cultivates a distinct visual universe that is consistent but simultaniously ever so surprising.

ECLIPSE as a series brings light, color and form to the forefront, together forming surreal landscapes that leave all suggestion of our world behind. Here, Paradis gracefully walks the line between reality and fantasy. The immersive multimedia installations come to life by a carefully curated process. The artist imagines the first idea for each image with a maquette, a blueprint that is later translated to staged on-site photographs. From here on, every costume, accessory and sculpture is meticulously designed by Paradis to suit her vision. This also introduces a performative aspect to her practice.

Aside from her photographic work, the artist also incorporates painting and sculpture into her series.  The wide array of media in her extensive artistic arsenal, strengthen eachother while often intersecting.

Marking the first time ever for her work to be exhibited in Germany, the exhibition will have its opening on the 12th of February and will last until the 15th of March.

]]>
#ZUKUNFT: “THE FUTURE BECOMES YOU” – WORDS BY LIAM CAGNEY https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/01/zukunft-the-future-becomes-you-words-by-liam-cagney/ Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:00:49 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57062

If, like me, you’re a techno head—wedded to dark dancefloors, addicted to sonorous strangeness—chances are, you’ve heard of the book Future Shock. Published in 1970, penned by husband-and-wife duo Alvin and Heidi Toffler (herein, when I say “Toffler,” I mean both authors) and selling millions of copies, Future Shock is a book that Detroit techno’s founding group Cybotron read and which supposedly fired their artistic imaginations. “Alvin Toffler’s book is a kind of bible to Detroit’s new musical revolutionaries,” noted John McCready in 1988 in the NME (indulging in hyperbole).

The term techno was already bouncing around the global musical grid by the early 1980s. But the term’s appearance in Toffler’s follow-up book, The Third Wave, chimed with and validated the emerging electronic music genre: “The techno rebels are, whether they recognize it or not, agents of the third wave,” wrote Toffler. “They will not vanish but multiply in the years ahead. For they are as much a part of the advance to a new stage of civilization as our missions to Venus, our amazing computers, our biological discoveries, or our explorations of the oceanic depths.” A seductive idea, but decades later, how does it fare? In this jaded age of ours, while our planet burns and the dancefloor distracts, what can Future Shock still tell us?
Future visions always reflect the person doing the prediction. For the tweedy English gentleman Arthur C. Clarke, the future is about humanity’s imperial encounters in outer space. For the drug-addled vagabond Philip K. Dick, the future means inane advertisements being beamed directly into your brain and not knowing whether or not you’re actually real. For the Queer Black outsider Octavia Butler, the future involves the mutant biological blending of humans and aliens. These are science fiction authors, but between science fiction and futurist analysis, there’s a fine line, with speculation in common.
Toffler was of the privileged class of WASPs, well educated and with a background in business and journalism. Future Shock reads like the jottings of a lofty MD, the type of sensible doctor who golfs on the weekends at the country club, the trusty gent to whom concerned postwar American parents turned when their little son Billy began exhibiting worrying signs of unsavouy homosexual urges, and who would sagely prescribe Billy a thorough course of electroshock therapy. “The basic thrust of this book is diagnosis,” Toffler writes, guiding Americans through the worrying world of tomorrow.

Toffler as guide describes built-in obsolescence, modular architecture, consumerist fads, style tribes, unorthodox families. Toffler describes how we will live under the sea, weather manipulation on a global scale, “research into communication between man and dolphin,” generating new species of bacteria, synthetic body parts, cloning, choosing your embryo’s sex and personality, cyborgs. The future is a disconcerting concatenation of phenomena arising, more or less, from the revolutions in communications technology, which Toffler diagnoses and prognosticates upon.
A notable feature of Future Shock is its air of seductive exoticism. “We who explore the future are like those ancient mapmakers,” Toffler writes proudly, savoring “new realities, filled with danger and promise, created by the accelerative thrust.” The future is a strange country full of unsettling customs. As such, Future Shock is at times an escape from a mundane present into a world of romantic fantasy, of teleportation, telepathy, cloning, eternal life, bodily augmentation: futurist analysis as a branch of supernatural literature.

Future Shock is also prescient. It accurately foresees the so-called experience economy (“One important class of experiential products will be based on simulated environments that offer the customer a taste of adventure, danger, sexual titillation or other pleasure without risk to his real life or reputation”—escape rooms, Meta and so on), remarking correctly that it “is clearly foreshadowed in the participatory techniques now being pioneered in the arts” (such as hippie happenings). In art, Future Shock observes a shift away from the classical arts towards immersive multisensory experiences: “Artists also have begun to create whole ‘environments’—works of art into which the audience may actually walk, and inside which things happen… The artists who produce these are really ‘experiential engineers.’” Which is basically the 2020s techno club.

“The future is like a weird alien virus infecting the public body, mutating all the cells of human society, rendering alien and dysmorphic the human self as hitherto known.”

Much of Future Shock is a lengthy footnote to the 1960s cultural revolution. “There are rich men who playact poverty, computer programmers who turn on with LSD. There are anarchists who, beneath their dirty denim shirts, are outrageous conformists, and conformists who, beneath their button-down collars, are outrageous anarchists. There are married priests and atheist ministers and Jewish Zen Buddhists… There are Playboy Clubs and homosexual movie theaters… amphetamines and tranquilizers… anger, affluence, and oblivion. Much oblivion.” The future is like a weird alien virus infecting the public body, mutating all the cells of human society, rendering alien and dysmorphic the human self as hitherto known.

Placating us, taking seriously their self-appointed job to tell us what all this means, Toffler presents this explosion of the future as a surface symptom of a deep structural change, the transition from one technological age to another. For Toffler, humanity has been defined by three waves: The first wave was agrarian humanity; the second wave was industrial humanity; and the third wave—the future exploding so strangely around us—is superindustrial humanity. Others have called the latter post-Fordist or postindustrial society, an economy no longer based on manufacturing but on services, no longer based on things but on information, a globalized world networked by information technology.

“The inhabitants of the earth are divided not only by race, nation, religion or ideology, but also, in a sense, by their position in time.”

“The inhabitants of the earth are divided not only by race, nation, religion or ideology, but also, in a sense, by their position in time,” Future Shock states. “Examining the present populations of the globe, we find a tiny group who still live, hunting and food-foraging, as men did millennia ago. Others, the vast majority of mankind, depend not on bear-hunting or berry-picking, but on agriculture.” In this view, all wars are effectively wars between different waves. Toffler describes the West as a system in a state of disequilibrium, waiting to settle again into a steady state. Adaptation will be key, informed by understanding.

Toffler is particularly focused on how modern society’s exhausting sense of endless transience affects our sense of self and of social connections. For Toffler, the twentieth century Western world’s explosion of consumer goods is one of the main indices for the third wave’s accelerated rate of change. We ourselves might measure the changing rate of change through the ubiquity of smartphones, the personal computers through which we mediate and zombify ourselves. Only ten years ago, not everyone had one, but now, it seems unimaginable that things were ever any different. The rapid change could not but leave some feeling existentially fraught, daunted by how suddenly our inner lives have been surrendered to surveillance capitalism.

“Future shock is the “shattering stress and disorientation that we induce in individuals by subjecting them to too much change in too short a time.””

Which brings in Toffler’s most famous concept, the titular future shock. “Future shock,” Toffler writes, is the “shattering stress and disorientation that we induce in individuals by subjecting them to too much change in too short a time.” The neologism is coined by analogy with culture shock, what happens to a Westerner when they fly to a far-flung place and throw themselves into a completely foreign culture, Delhi, say, to head-spinning effect. Psychologist Sven Lundstedt defined culture shock as a “form of personality maladjustment which is a reaction to a temporarily unsuccessful attempt to adjust to new surroundings and people.” Expanding on this, Toffler defines future shock as “what happens when the familiar psychological cues that help an individual to function in society are suddenly withdrawn and replaced by new ones that are strange or incomprehensible.’

For the future-shocked person, “the strange society may itself be changing only very slowly, yet for him it is all new. Signs, sounds and other psychological cues rush past him before he can grasp their meaning. The entire experience takes on a surrealistic air. Every word, every action is shot through with uncertainty. In this setting, fatigue arrives more quickly than usual.” Acceleration, change and adaptation are key concepts assumed by this framework. Through providing an explanation of what’s going on at a deep structural level, Future Shock helps Joe and Jane Middle America adapt and regain stability amidst the typhoon of transformation. “The problem is not, therefore, to suppress change, which cannot be done, but to manage it. If we opt for rapid change in certain sectors of life, we can consciously attempt to build stability zones elsewhere.” And, indeed, to capitalize on it: one of Toffler’s later books is called Revolutionary Wealth: How It Will Be Created and How It Will Change Our Lives.

As I close Future Shock’s covers, my main takeaway is a contrary view. I am not a past person forced to live in an environment of the future; I am a future person forced to live within the environment of the past. I have past shock. The tyranny of the everyday—of conventional national identity, sexuality identity, gender identity, personhood at all in the first place—is completely bewildering. It has shocked me my whole life. I do not want to absorb the future into the everyday and thus to tame it: I want to be drained of all pastness and absorbed into a futurity that can never be contained within any earthly roots.

Techno helps me to do that. Within the club’s darkness—through immersion in flickering lights and out-there sounds and rhythms like insect heartbeats—techno envelops you in silence. Then, techno whispers that yes, what you feel despite it all is real, that history is madness and selfhood a fantasy. If a techno set by, say, Jeff Mills provokes shock in us—shock at its relentless strangeness, through its insane electronic loops—it is a shock we should embrace, recognizing as it does our real self, our future self.

]]>