Culture – Numéro Berlin https://www.numeroberlin.de Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:15:17 +0000 en-US hourly 1 TO WATCH “LÜGEN ÜBER MEINE MUTTER” BY ARON LEHMANN https://www.numeroberlin.de/2026/10/to-watch-lugen-uber-meine-mutter-by-aron-lehmann/ Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:11:07 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=75905 WHAT WILL THEY THINK OF US?

 

Italy, summer, ice cream. The sea, the heat, a family holiday. Seven-year-old Ela (Elise Lindner) sits beside her mother Cornelia (Rosalie Thomass), watching her laugh freely while speaking Italian as ice cream melts in the sun. These moments feel weightless. When the family returns to their provincial town in West Germany in the 1980s, that warmth disappears. Werner (Golo Euler) has decided what is wrong with his life: his stalled career, his lack of social standing, even the way the family is perceived by their neighbors. And for him, the explanation is always Cornelia’s body.

What follows is a slow tightening of the space around her. Werner monitors what Cornelia eats, excludes her from social occasions and resists her attempts to return to work. When her inheritance allows the family to build the house he wants, it brings him the status he has been chasing, but Cornelia remains financially dependent and increasingly isolated. Ela watches all of this unfold, initially absorbing her father’s perception of her mother before gradually learning to distinguish it from the woman she actually knows.

Director Aron Lehmann makes Ela’s perspective the film’s defining element. The camera frequently stays at her height, looking up at adults whose conversations and decisions remain only partly comprehensible to her. Rather than explaining what Ela feels, the film lets her uncertainty shape what we see. Ela occasionally returns as a narrator, breaking the fourth wall, looking back on moments her younger self could not yet understand. The effect creates a quiet distance between memory and experience, allowing the audience to discover the family dynamic alongside her.

 

 

The visual language reinforces that childlike disorientation without turning it into a gimmick. In one striking sequence, Cornelia lies collapsed on the floor and sends Ela away to eat, with the image suddenly turning upside down as Ela moves through the room. It is one of the rare moments in which the film briefly shifts away from Ela’s usual vantage point, making the physical world feel as unstable as the one she is trying to understand. Lehmann trusts the perspective of a child who sees and absorbs far more than she can articulate.

The performances make that perspective particularly affecting. Rosalie Thomass gives Cornelia warmth and vitality alongside the gradual exhaustion of a woman constantly being told to make herself smaller. Golo Euler plays Werner with an unsettling mixture of self-pity, insecurity and resentment, while Juliane Köhler brings a sharpness to Martha, Cornelia’s mother in law, whose complicity reinforces the pressure on Cornelia. Elise Lindner (Ela), meanwhile, carries the film’s emotional centre with remarkable restraint, capturing a child caught between what her parents tell her and what she instinctively understands.

Based on Daniela Dröscher’s bestselling novel, “Lügen über meine Mutter” is ultimately less interested in explaining its characters than in showing how a child learns to make sense of them. What begins as Ela’s attempt to understand why her father sees her mother the way he does becomes a quieter story about perception, memory and the things children understand long before they have the words for them. “Lügen über meine Mutter” hits German cinemas on October 8.

]]>
IN CONVERSATION WITH ADRIANO SACK https://www.numeroberlin.de/2026/10/in-conversation-with-adriano-sack/ Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:44:20 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=75815 THE GLAMOR AND THE CRACKS BENEATH

After years of working as a journalist, Adriano Sack turned to fiction with his first novel, Noto. His latest book, In die Sonne fliegen, enters the world of fashion through Felix Kellergeist, a young man whose appearance quickly becomes his greatest asset. We spoke to Sack about glamour, ambition, friendship and the realities beneath the surface of the fashion world.

 

You worked as a journalist for many years before publishing your first novel, Noto. Why did you only turn to literature at that point?

Literature was always there. I just didn’t see it. Maybe it scared me.

 

Did your work as a journalist make literary writing easier, or did you first have to unlearn certain journalistic reflexes?

A good rule in journalism is: show, don’t tell. But in fact, I had to unlearn the whole explaining, analysing, contextualising, commenting thing. At least the kind of literature I try to write doesn’t proclaim pamphlets, but tells stories.

 

Your first novel is about love, grief and loss. In die Sonne fliegen now takes us right into the world of fashion. What appealed to you about this change?

In die Sonne fliegen is about grief, love and loss. But it is also about private jets, photo shoots and parties on oligarchs’ yachts. What appealed to me was the glamour on the surface – and everything that was simmering and starting to crack underneath.

 

Everything simmering and cracking underneath.

 

 

The novel begins with an unusual image: Felix Kellergeist works as an Easter Bunny for a fashion designer and shortly afterwards becomes a sought-after model. What was the first idea or scene that this story grew out of?

I found this image so endearing and surreal: a dream boy dressed up as an Easter Bunny and a crazy fashion designer who hires him – who wouldn’t want to read on?

 

Felix is discovered before he has decided for himself who he actually wants to be. Is the novel also a story about how other people construct an identity for us?

Felix is quick-witted  and doesn’t leave control to others. His literary role model, Felix Krull, also made the transition from hotel page to con man in the blink of an eye.

 

What interests you about people to whom success seems to come effortlessly, and who suddenly become part of a world they previously had no access to?

For one, I’m profoundly jealous of people who make it all look effortless. At the same time, I’m fascinated by what new worlds, circumstances and people do to them. Even in my own novel. I knew from the beginning where the story would end, but I didn’t know how the protagonists would get there.

 

In fashion, people are constantly being looked at and judged, their appearance turned into an image. What happens to Felix once his looks become his most valuable asset?

Felix had been used to being, as the novel puts it, the most attractive person in the room from childhood onwards. But while in his youth he simply accepted and enjoyed it (girls, boys, parties, etc.), he increasingly begins to use his charms strategically.

 

Without a fall, the ascent isn’t worth telling.

 

The title In die Sonne fliegen suggests ascent, but also carries the danger of burning up. Was this ambivalence central to the novel from the beginning?

Yes, of course. Without a fall, the ascent isn’t worth telling. Otherwise the novel would be a never-ending escalator.

 

Felix, Merc, Genie, Kelly and Fox form the “Glam-Gang”. What connects them beyond parties, success and their shared status?

What connects them is something they first have to figure out. Beauty, intelligence, hunger and an over-alert sense of reality? At first, it’s simply the feeling that together they can conquer the fashion world. They quickly realize what separates them, too. In the end, it’s about friendship.

 

Are genuine friendships even possible in a world shaped by competition, attention and hierarchies?

They are possible, but they require a sharp eye, a good heart and a lot of work.

 

You have known the fashion industry from a close perspective for decades. Why did you want to write a novel about this world now?

I wanted to write a novel about a young man who enchants the world and drives it to despair. And the fashion world, with its beautiful and dark sides, seemed to me a suitable habitat for this kind of person. Besides, we live in a world where so many people present themselves on social media, optimize themselves and yearn for recognition. Basically we are all Felix.

 

A sharp eye, a good heart and a lot of work

 

How much reality is in the book, without individual characters being identifiable as specific people?

They’ll have to figure that out for yourself. Reality is lurking everywhere, although sometimes disguised or distorted. The visit to the Capitoline Museums, to see the Dying Gaul, really happened. So did the homeless man with his bare backside and a robe pulled over his head.

 

Were there experiences from your own career that you could only tell through fiction?

Everything is very personal. This novel, too.

 

From the outside, the fashion world is often described either as a glamorous fantasy or as a superficial, exploitative system. What gets lost in both portrayals?

Wonderful, highly talented, sensitive people work in fashion. Or, as a fashion designer in my novel says: “Fashion requires a particular openness. It attracts the vulnerable.”

 

The fashion industry presents itself as more diverse, conscious and political today. How much has actually changed in its power structures?

Much less has changed than we were promised. And much of it has been rolled back again. Or how many plus-size models have you seen on the important runways lately? Instead, robots are dancing at Vogue World in Milan, and everyone is utterly ashamed of themselves, because the current discourse around the power of machines is happening somewhere completely different.

 

You tell the story of this world with humor and affection, but also with a great deal of skepticism. Is the book more of a declaration of love, a reckoning, or perhaps both?

I can’t write a book without anger and love.

 

“I can’t write a book without anger and love.”

 

Looking back on your own early years in the magazine and fashion world: do you recognize yourself more in Felix, or in the people who observe and steer his rise?

I’m not a director, I’m a chronicler. But of course I always wished I had Felix’s almost perfect ears and foal-like legs. In the end, I’m probably Fox, the trans woman with good intentions.

 

What has the fashion world taught you about people that you might never have understood outside the industry?

That flamboyance requires a particular kind of toughness. But honestly, I already learned that when I was working in nightlife.

 

Has writing the novel changed the way you look at your own past or at success?

Writing my novels has fundamentally changed my life. But I don’t know exactly how yet.

 

Success, of course it’s fake.

 

What do you want to tell next after In die Sonne fliegen? Is there already a new story occupying your mind?

I’m working on a pirate novel. And at some point, the great fantasy epic will come. And in between, the autofictional book Verlorene Männer about drugs, sex and torn PVC trousers by Jean Collona.

 

And what does success mean to you today, after experiencing and observing it from so many different perspectives?

Success is the hare the greyhounds are chasing. Of course, it’s fake.

 

 

]]>
IN CONVERSATION WITH NEUSWANSTEIN https://www.numeroberlin.de/2026/10/in-conversation-with-neuswanstein/ Tue, 06 Oct 2026 14:34:09 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=74494 Neuswanstein and the Return of Something Real

 

Maybe it’s the guitars. Maybe it’s the return of indie sleaze, blurry flash photography and nights that feel a little less calculated. Or maybe it’s simply a longing for music that doesn’t sound like it was made with an algorithm in mind.

Somewhere within that feeling, Neuswanstein is taking shape. The new duo brings together two quite different musical worlds: Julian van Zico comes from indie rock, Fabian Prekrat from hip-hop and electronic music. What started casually — through mutual friends, jam sessions and no particular master plan — has turned into a sound that combines guitars and electronic production, pop-punk nostalgia and a distinctly contemporary edge.

And this is only the beginning. With their first tracks out and a collaboration with Dschungel and the mastermind behind it, Götz Offergeld, coming soon, Neuswanstein is a name to keep an eye on. But before things start moving faster, we wanted to catch Julian and Fabian at the beginning — to talk about where they come from, why indie suddenly feels exciting again, the value of imperfection in an increasingly AI-driven world, and why sometimes the best things are the ones you never planned.

 

Ann-Kathrin Riedl: First of all, tell me a little about your musical backgrounds.

Julian: I’m actually part of the indie-rock scene. I play in various bands and have been involved in all kinds of projects since my teenage years. My main instrument is the guitar. As long as a project leans towards rock or indie, I’m really into it.

AKR: How did the two of you meet?

Fabian: About two years ago, I started jamming with Stefan, a mutual friend from Peru. We were just playing guitar, trying things out, messing around. Then Julian and I happened to meet at a Christmas dinner Stefan had organized, and he brought me over to Julian’s studio. The three of us jammed together, and it immediately felt right.

Julian: Stefan is actually the hardest rocker among us, which makes it funny that he brought us together. Fabi comes more from hip-hop and electronic music, while I’m somewhere in between. You can hear that in Moving to LA: his instinct for contemporary sounds meets my endless nostalgia for Sum 41, Blink-182, post-punk and pop-punk. It comes together really nicely.

 

AKR: That’s funny, because when I first heard the song, I immediately thought of the music I used to watch on MTV.

Julian: Before we started writing, we had a bunch of demos that were still pretty electronic. But at some point, we listened to a lot of reference tracks and realized: okay, no, this needs to rock. I had already sensed that. Fabi had been missing some of that guitar energy too. So it suddenly clicked.

AKR: Why do you think that sound feels so right again now?

Julian: Indie sleaze has been creeping back for a while, but right now it feels especially present. You see it in a lot of new bands. I recently came across this new Berlin duo, the Nightclubs, and they look like they’ve stepped straight out of New York in 2009. Maybe we’re drawn to that era because it was the last time the world still felt somewhat in order.

AKR: I think there’s also a longing for something authentic and wild. Everything has become so calculated and cautious. People want to break out again, to let something loose.

Julian: Totally. Nights just felt different then. Even the aesthetic takes me back to the Flickr days — that time right before everything became driven by algorithms. Maybe that was the last truly authentic phase of the internet. I’m sure there are a million reasons why it’s coming back. But for me, it’s also just about the look. It simply looks cool.

Fabian: For me, it’s also about the physicality of it. I started playing guitar as a teenager, then moved into electronic music and eventually hip-hop, sampling and all of that. At some point I realized I missed actually holding an instrument and recording it. Maybe not everything goes perfectly during the recording, but that’s exactly what gives it character. That’s my approach.

Julian: And that’s the last thing we still have over AI: the unpredictability of a live performance. You already hear AI-generated music that’s almost indistinguishable from other music. But if there’s a tiny mistake somewhere in a guitar take, something that isn’t perfectly quantized, that suddenly feels valuable. In a strange way, imperfection is becoming precious again.

AKR: Because with AI, live performance is basically the one thing that can remain real.

Julian: Exactly. And a lot of people in music are already saying that everything is becoming more expensive while budgets are shrinking. AI videos will probably become normal soon. But the live moment is much harder to replace. I think that will become increasingly important.

AKR: When did this turn from having fun together into an actual band?

Fabian: It came out of this very specific project. We started seriously planning to record something and put it out. The whole thing was confusing and crazy at first, but at some point we thought: okay, we’re actually going to make this. We never really sat down and said, “Now we’re a band.” It just happened.

Julian: It started with jamming and having fun. It was very idealistic: “Hey, we’re friends, let’s make something cool together.”

AKR: Which almost feels unusual now, when creativity is so quickly expected to become a strategy or a product.

Fabian: Exactly. We grew purely out of fun. We didn’t have a band name, a target or a release plan. We met a few times and tried to establish a routine simply because we wanted to get better together and have fun. Only later did it become: okay, maybe we should actually release something.

Julian: I also think people often approach music in a very goal-oriented way now: “I need a hit, I need a record.” But when you’re young, you don’t think like that. You just play. Maybe the next song is a reggae track, then a ballad, then something completely different. We’re trying to keep some of that freedom.

AKR: So essentially, you create from a place that comes from the heart rather than overthinking it.

Julian: Exactly. There are endless days where we try a thousand things in the studio and end up sticking with nothing. We don’t have a huge master plan behind it. That’s actually what I love about it.

AKR: Your name is Neuswanstein, which might raise an eyebrow or two. Where did it come from? What was the original idea behind it?

Julian: I just think König Ludwig was crazy. My dad used to act in a play where King Ludwig was a character. Even as a kid, I found it absurd to learn about this person in school who went wild with state funds, was gay, and cared way more about art and culture than boring day-to-day state business. He had this almost extravagant, tragic existence. I’ve always found that fascinating. And of course there’s the castle — this completely over-the-top symbol of fantasy.

AKR: Fabian, as a native of Munich, what does the name mean to you?

Fabian: I love it. We’re both from the Munich area, so there’s obviously a connection. But what I like about Neuschwanstein is that it’s almost surreal. You have this very conservative idea of Bavaria, and then suddenly there’s this completely excessive fairytale castle sitting in the landscape. That contradiction is great.

AKR: That’s actually what I find interesting about Bavaria in general. It has this very traditional image, but there’s also another side — eccentric, rebellious, sometimes almost punk.

Fabian: Definitely. None of us completely fits the Bavarian cliché. I moved to Berlin, and when I tell people I’m from Bavaria, they sometimes have a very specific image in mind. Then they meet you and realize it’s not quite that simple.

Julian: Bavaria is strange because the inventive spirit is there, but it often comes through industrial channels: cars, engineering, huge companies. At the same time, there are these eccentric characters who completely contradict the stereotype. King Ludwig is probably the ultimate example. There’s something rebellious in that too.

AKR: Fabian, your own path into music wasn’t necessarily straightforward either. You studied business administration in Munich.

Fabian: I studied sports, event and media management. For me, music was never a planned career path — just a hobby and a feeling. I’m still not the best guitar player or musician, but whenever I hear something, I try to figure it out. I’ve always enjoyed recording little ideas and putting them together. Eventually I thought: why not see what happens if I actually give this some time?

Julian: And now Fabi has an extremely good taste level. I’m always impressed by what he finds. I had no idea about artists like Mk.gee until he showed me. I was like: where do you find this stuff?

AKR: Things can move incredibly fast now. What are the next steps for the whole project?

Julian: We want to make an EP and hopefully gain a few listeners along the way. But honestly, the main thing is that we enjoy making it. If it evolves naturally, great. If it doesn’t, that’s okay too.

Fabian: Over the last few months, we’ve had references and a direction we liked, but whenever we tried to push too hard toward something specific, it became too calculated. The EP will tell us where this wants to go.

AKR: Moving to LA, your new release with Dschungel, feels quite different from your other tracks. What does the song represent for you?

Julian: I basically had the song completely done except for the bridge. The first demo already had that line, “I’m moving to LA without you,” and the first verse. I immediately thought it was a strong idea. At first, I was worried people might misunderstand the title because it can sound a bit cliché — moving to LA, chasing something bigger. But then I realized that misunderstanding was interesting in itself.

Fabian: When Götz first heard the demo, it immediately resonated with him. At the time, both he and Julian were going through heartbreak and were in a similar emotional state: you have a certain idea of your life and where it’s going, and then suddenly things don’t turn out the way you imagined. Götz continued writing the lyrics, and together we finalized the song. So Moving to LA is essentially a snapshot of how we were feeling at that particular moment in time.

Julian: My initial idea was actually to write it from the perspective of someone leaving LA and moving back to Berlin — because that was becoming a reality for some people around us. But eventually the song found its own meaning. It wasn’t planned. That’s often the best way things happen.

 

AKR: What’s the musical idea behind the project as a whole?

 

Julian: For me, it needs to contain enough guitar that we can actually reproduce it live. I want it to feel electronic and indie at the same time — a bit like the way The Hellp combine those references.

 

Fabian: And I want to be able to DJ our music, but also play it live. We could bring in external friends and family if we want to stand onstage as a five-piece with drums and everything. But there’s also enough of an electronic backbone that we could simply DJ and plug in a guitar. That versatility is the idea.

 

Julian: It’s too early to define it too strictly. For us, it’s mostly about expressing emotions through music.

 

AKR: I hope I get to see you live soon.

]]>
IN CONVERSATION WITH ARNAUD FRISCH https://www.numeroberlin.de/2026/10/in-conversation-with-arnaud-frisch/ Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:33:44 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=75608 ARNAUD FRISCH BRINGS PARIS’ SILENCIO CLUB TO BERLIN

 

 

 

Fifteen years ago, Silencio opened its doors in Paris and quickly became a landmark for the city’s creative community. Its founder is French entrepreneur Arnaud Frisch. To mark its 15th anniversary, Silencio is bringing its concept to Berlin with a temporary pop-up in the former Watergate space. Opening on 30 October 2026, Silencio Berlin will bring together music, art, cinema and design while connecting with the city’s creative scene. Following the opening party, our Deputy Editor in Chief Antonia Maria Schmidt sat down with Frisch to talk about Berlin nightlife, the idea behind the new space, his long-standing friendship with Mumi Haiati and the evolution of Silencio over the past 15 years.

 

 

 

 

MILENA ZARA

 

 

Antonia Schmidt: You’ve already done several pop-ups in other cities. Why now Berlin?

Arnaud Frisch: In Berlin, club culture has historically functioned as a cultural form in its own right, bringing together music, performance, visual culture and communities in an organic way. In that sense, Berlin feels very close to something that has always been central to Silencio.

 

AS: Nightlife as well.

AF: Berlin is the model. This city has inspired the rest of the world. I have great admiration for the clubs here, the ones still running and the ones that are gone, and not only for the music. What Berlin built is a place where individual freedom is taken seriously, where people are protected and where everyone is allowed to be whoever they are for a night.

 

AS: Watergate specifically is a great location.

AF: Watergate is a landmark, and taking over a room with that history is intimidating. It drew its own path to the city with that window onto the Spree. Anyone who has watched the sun come up over the water from the lower floor knows it. Its closing was a real loss for Berlin. What mattered to us was that it stays a club rather than becoming offices.

 

 

 

 

 

 

AS: Can you tell me a bit about the program already?

AF: Cultural programming is the centre of the project. In Paris, beyond the club nights, we run carte blanche invitations, art performances, concerts, installations and talks. The first Berlin night already gave a sense of it: a performance by Valentina Magaletti, DJ sets from Richie Hawtin and Ben Klock, and a limited-edition military tag by Maurizio Cattelan given to everyone who came.

AS: Berlin has this quality, where all these different scenes are already so connected to each other. The music scene overlaps with the fashion scene, the film scene… A lot of people are already in exchange with each other.

AF: In Paris the scenes overlap, but they’re vertical. Everything passes through institutions, and each world has its own gatekeepers. Berlin is horizontal. People collaborate before anyone has given them permission, and that changes what a night can be.

AS: Tell me a bit about your relationship with Mumi, the founder of Reference Studios who is now supporting you with the pop up.

AF: It happened naturally. Mumi came to our first Fashion Week at Silencio. His agency was new then and was doing things nobody else was doing: connecting fashion with art, hospitality, and other fields. That was very close to how we were already working. We kept crossing paths around the world, and it grew from there.

 

INTERVIEW & WORDS BY ANTONIA SCHMIDT
MAX HEEB
JOSEPH KADOW
JOSEPH KADOW
MILENA ZARA

 

AS: I’m curious, how do you see Berlin nightlife?

 

AF: What Berlin has is unique, and it’s now official: the city’s Technokultur has been recognised as intangible cultural heritage. And it comes with things no other city can offer, spaces you simply don’t find elsewhere and a freedom that has no equivalent anywhere in the world. That’s also why we’ve spent years bringing Berlin to Paris rather than the other way around. At our Parisian club FVTVR we regularly host Berlin collectives and clubs: BCCO, Pornceptual, Primal Instinct, Multisex, RSO…

AS: You’ve spent so much time in Paris and now you’ll be spending more time in Berlin. What feels different between the two cities?

 

AF: Berlin is much bigger than Paris, with parks and green space everywhere, and you feel it immediately. Paris is a finished city, in the sense that it was built long ago and nothing is left over. You work inside what already exists.

AS: You collaborated with Studio Karhard for the club.

 

AF: Studio Karhard made this project possible. Thomas Karsten knows this city and everything that opening a club here involves. Marc Leschelier’s work is fascinating: brutalist, sometimes uncomfortable and very poetic. Then Studio Raito did the lighting.

 

 

AS: The lighting was great. I told my friend at the opening party, the lighting is really, really good.

AF: Lighting can transform a room completely. Studio Raito doesn’t light a space the way a club is usually lit, from above and onto the crowd. They treat light as material: they place sources within the architecture, work with reflection and shadow as much as with brightness, and let the fixtures themselves be visible objects rather than hidden equipment. The result reads closer to an installation than to a lighting rig.

AS: Tell me about the objects in the club, particularly the big installation on the terrace?

AF: Marc Leschelier’s work draws on an abstract architectural vocabulary, using materials associated with construction and heavy industry while often leaving their function deliberately unclear. On the floating pontoon, this pavilion is draped in a cement-impregnated textile more commonly used in heavy infrastructure, which hardens through contact with water.

AS: What is it that makes a good club?

AF: There are a lot of great clubs, and there’s no single formula, which is the good news. What Berlin taught me is the value of time: giving people long enough to actually experience several artists.

AS: How you curate?

AF: Well, a club is very much about curation. The way you design the space, the artists you bring in, the music, the installations. It all shapes the experience. But at the end, the most important thing is to bring people together around artists and ideas to create a community. This is also a curation.

INTERVIEW & WORDS BY ANTONIA SCHMIDT
JOSEPH KADOW
JOSEPH KADOW
JOSEPH KADOW
JOSEPH KADOW
JOSEPH KADOW
JOSEPH KADOW
]]>
WEEKEND MUSIC TIP PT 112 EAU DE COLOGNE https://www.numeroberlin.de/2026/10/weekend-music-tip-pt-112-eau-de-cologne/ Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:13:11 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=75252 Eau De Cologne: From Bassiani to Berlin, With Love

Four years after it began as a queer party series at Tbilisi’s Bassiani club, housed in a former swimming pool beneath the city’s Dinamo Arena football stadium, Eau De Cologne has evolved into a wider platform for music, nightlife, performance and visual art. Since then, its parties have travelled beyond Georgia to international spaces including Basement in New York and the queer festival WHOLE. Founded by Giga Gulverdashvili, Natuta Bagrationi, Dato Koridze and artist Uta Bekaia, the project has become an important part of Georgia’s underground queer culture, creating space for artistic expression and community at a time of growing political pressure on queer life. Now bringing its multidisciplinary programme to Berlin’s KREUZWERK on 2nd October, Eau de Cologne is presenting work by Georgian artists across performance, sculpture, photography, film, sound and installation, drawing on Georgian rituals, mythology and collective memory to explore queer identity within a culture where it is increasingly presented as something foreign.

We spoke to Uta Bekaia about the evolution of Eau de Cologne, the role of the underground, taking Georgian queer culture beyond its borders, reclaiming heritage, and the importance of documenting queer life in Georgia.

 

 

Billy Burrell: Eau De Cologne began four years ago as a queer party series at Bassiani. What was the original idea behind the project, and how has it evolved since?

Uta Bekaia: Eau de Cologne began when four of us, Giga Gulverdashvili, Natuta Bagrationi, Dato Koridze and I, came together to create a party series. We wanted to create a space where people could freely express their sexuality, gender and identity. The strict door policy and dress code create a sense of equality on the dance floor: once inside, everyone is on the same level. We came from different creative backgrounds, which became one of the project’s strengths. Today, we are slowly growing our community in Georgia and internationally, with residents including Cormac, MVHY and GeorgiシooOoOOoO, alongside co-founders Citizen Union and Natuta.

BB: Tbilisi has a particularly complex relationship with queer visibility and nightlife. What role has the underground scene played in giving queer people a space to express themselves?

UB: The underground scene has played an important role in the development of the Georgian queer movement. It has created protected spaces where self-expression can exist more freely than in many other parts of public life. On the dance floor, the limitations of everyday life are temporarily suspended, allowing a strong, self-defined culture to grow. It is not simply an imported idea of queerness, but something rooted in our own experiences, bodies, aesthetics, friendships and histories. The underground has therefore been more than nightlife. It has been a space for experimentation, community and survival.

“The underground has been more than nightlife. It has been a space for experimentation, community and survival.”
BB: The project brings together DJs, drag performers, visual artists and other creatives. What does this intersection of music, performance and visual culture allow you to express that a traditional club night perhaps can’t?

UB: It allows us to build an entire artistic world. In Tbilisi, there are still very few spaces where queer art can be presented openly, so Eau De Cologne creates a temporary environment where artists can work without censoring themselves or separating their identity from their practice. Bringing together music, performance, costume, photography, installation and visual art allows us to tell a more complete story. Artists including Levan Mindiashvili, David Apakidze, Fagatta and Raffaella Toxicana are documenting Georgian queer self-expression in real time, and we are happy to bring that work to KREUZWERK.

BB: There is often a perception of nightlife as escapism, but your parties seem to suggest that celebration itself can be a form of resistance. Do you think that’s an accurate take?

UB: I think it is, but celebration has a very different meaning in a repressed country like Georgia than it might in Berlin. Simply occupying space openly as a queer person can become a political act. Dancing, being visible, touching another person, wearing something extravagant or expressing your gender freely can all become forms of resistance. For us, self-expression and dancing are political and social acts, even when we are not consciously making a political statement. At the same time, I wish we had the privilege of romanticising it less. We would much rather live in a situation where queer joy could simply be celebration.

“Simply occupying space openly as a queer person can become a political act.”
BB: The project has increasingly expanded beyond the club, bringing together artists, performers and other creatives from across Georgia. What does bringing this wider artistic programme to Berlin mean for Eau de Cologne?

UB: It is important for us that what we create is seen beyond Tbilisi. Bringing this work to Berlin makes Georgian queer culture visible as part of a wider international community, while also giving us a sense of validation and protection. Knowing that our work is being witnessed outside Georgia makes us feel that our voices cannot simply be erased. We want to make our stories visible and leave something behind in collective memory. Bringing Eau De Cologne to Berlin is not about presenting Georgia as an exotic place, but showing the complexity, creativity, humour, darkness and vitality of life there.

BB: Your work often draws on Georgian ancestral rituals and collective memory, which you reinterpret through a queer perspective. What does reconnecting with that heritage mean to you personally?

UB: This is central to my artistic practice. In contemporary Georgia, the increasingly nationalist and conservative climate often presents queer people as somehow foreign to the culture. Through my work, I try to reclaim my heritage and position myself within it. I look at Georgian history, rituals, mythology and collective memory and ask: where are we in this history? Where have queer bodies and forms of expression existed, even if they were not named in the language we use today? For me, reclaiming heritage means refusing the idea that I am a foreign body within my own culture. Queerness is not outside identity, but part of its history and future.

“Queerness is not outside identity, but part of its history and future.”
BB: Several of the artists work with ritual, from ancestral practices to Georgian Orthodox imagery. How important is the idea of reclaiming or reinterpreting tradition within queer culture?

UB: It is extremely important. The Georgian queer movement is still relatively young and constantly searching for its own language. We do not want to simply reproduce models developed elsewhere. We need to understand queerness through our own history, symbols, rituals and cultural references. Artists have an important role in that process because there is no preexisting manual telling us what our culture is supposed to look like. We are making it as we go. Reinterpreting tradition allows us to challenge the idea that it belongs only to one group or political ideology. Tradition can be questioned, transformed and reimagined.

BB: There is a striking movement between the intimate and the political in the artists’ work, from personal identity and memory to protest, minority rights and social change. How do you see those two sides connecting?

UB: It is almost impossible for an artist to completely separate their personal life from their artistic practice, especially within marginalised communities. When your identity is something you constantly have to negotiate with your family, community, institutions or the state, the personal inevitably becomes political. For us, finding a way to live authentically is not only an individual process. We are collectively trying to make a path for ourselves and those who come after us. The personal therefore becomes collective, and a private act of self-expression can become part of a larger cultural movement.

“The personal therefore becomes collective, and a private act of self-expression can become part of a larger cultural movement.”
BB: Dato’s photography documents queer life alongside wider political and social realities in Georgia. What do photography and documentation offer that nightlife itself cannot?

UB: Documentation allows us to preserve what is happening above and below the surface. Without it, the histories we are creating can disappear. Future generations need evidence that these lives existed and that these spaces were created. Photography can therefore function as collective memory. Dato’s work is not simply documenting parties, protest and everyday life. It is documenting a particular period of Georgian social history through a queer gaze. Without those images, we might know that something happened, but it would be much harder to understand what it felt like to live through it.

BB: The Berlin programme brings together artists working across performance, sculpture, film, photography, sound and installation. What does this collective presentation allow you to say about queer life that might be difficult to express through a single perspective?

UB: We want the Berlin queer community to see how we live, what we create and what our world looks and feels like. It is also important to show what could potentially be lost. At a moment when queer rights and visibility are under increasing pressure, we want to make visible the rawness, vitality and complexity of underground life. That is why we use different artistic media. Each can communicate something the others cannot. Rather than giving the audience one fixed interpretation, we want them to make their own connections. The party becomes a form of storytelling, fragmented, emotional, symbolic and collective.

“The party becomes a form of storytelling, fragmented, emotional, symbolic and collective.”
]]>
TO WATCH “CORPUS DELICTI” BY LENA STAHL https://www.numeroberlin.de/2026/09/to-watch-corpus-delicti-by-lena-stahl/ Wed, 30 Sep 2026 13:53:38 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=75104
A WORLD TOO CLOSE TO HOME

Santé, and welcome to a world that doesn’t feel too far removed from today’s reality. A world in which all illness has been eradicated, sanitized, organized and most importantly: safe. Or at least that’s what it promises to be. Where your health is your most important concern. An order, imposed by the state you live in. And welcome to the life of Mia Holl (Hannah Herzsprung), a neuroscientist in the system, thankful for the order in her life and her artificial home assistant who asks about her day and plays her favorite music. A bodiless voice, comparable to certain virtual assistants already present in some people’s homes. It already sets the tone of the film. Current, threatening and omnipresent.

A society where everything is based on the “Method”: laws, security, privacy. Even the central dating agency run by the government, based on genetic matches, might seem tempting in a world of failing dating apps. You might even catch yourself weighing the opportunity, only to be scared by your own thought a second later. Surveillance of your every move, and even if it sounds dystopian to us now, the film makes it look almost temptingly harmonious. At least for the first 15 minutes.

Then we get introduced to Mia’s brother, Moritz Holl (Damian Hardung), a free spirit, living by his own rules, rejecting the grip of the “Method” on their lives. You remember, yes, that’s an actual human, we were brainwashed for a second, with all the smooth-running interaction, trains on time and all illnesses eradicated, it seemed too perfect to be true. Because it wasn’t. But then Moritz gets arrested for the crime of rape and murder, which he insists are not true. And yet his DNA matches 100% with the DNA found on the victim.

 

 

Mia, and with her the viewers, are caught in the middle: on the one hand, she believes in the “Method”, after all, science has declared it infallible; on the other hand, she wants to believe her brother’s words. So she starts questioning the “Method”, something that shakes the foundation of this very society. As she is labelled an “Antimethodist”, not only does her social environment turn against her, her colleagues, her neighbors, society as a whole, but she also gets arrested as a terrorist, a revolutionary without ever wanting to be one, because those who think differently have no place in society.

The film, made by Lena Stahl and based on the play written in 2007 and later developed into a novel by Juli Zeh, is one of Germany’s best-known contemporary dystopian novels. In 2007 she wrote about a dystopian future not too far away, only 50 years away, and looking at it today, in 2026, she might not have been too far from it coming true. The film makes its currency even clearer.

The sets look real, probably because most of it was shot in existing locations that just happen to have a futuristic look to them, the soundtrack by Volker Bertelmann and Lennart Saathoff is minimal but emphasizes the atmosphere throughout the film, from the structured order in the beginning to the gentle moments between siblings to the confusion and anger of the protagonist.

 

 

Hannah Herzsprung delivers a convincing, more action-driven character than in the novel, fitting the atmosphere of the film and making the viewer feel with her on her quest to find answers. Damian Hardung makes Moritz feel like a brother we can relate to, while still leaving us to question his trustworthiness in some moments. His character gets a lot more time with our protagonist than in the novel, which enriches the relationship and emotional turmoil of Mia. Haley Louise Jones as a torn colleague turned friend of Mia makes you think of yourself in her position, making the viewer plead with Mia for her help and trust. Christian Friedel as the government-appointed lawyer for Moritz and later on also Mia adds another layer of people working for the government who are fed up with the “Method” but still work within its system, and Alexander Fehling as a journalist, who preaches that he wants to explore the truth and give Mia a voice, yet the audience can never be too certain of his real agenda, intentions and trustworthiness.

The dystopian genre in films was at its height during the early 2010s, yet over the last few years, there have been almost no new ones coming out, possibly to do with the almost dystopian society we experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic in the early 2020s. Now, AI is developing rapidly and is being used so extensively by everyone around us that it appears impossible to escape its spell, “Corpus Delicti” shows a reality that seems closer to what today’s reality looks like than any Hunger Games film we’ve seen so far. “Corpus Delicti” scares us with how real and possible its plot appears, while also leaving the viewer with little closure and plenty of food for thought. “Corpus Delicti” is out in cinemas all over Germany starting October 1st.

]]>
IN CONVERSATION WITH JOEL EVEY & NICK FROSST https://www.numeroberlin.de/2026/09/in-conversation-with-joel-evey-nick-frosst/ Fri, 18 Sep 2026 09:44:37 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=74009 COHERE: REIMAGINING AI THROUGH CULTURE

As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, Cohere is asking a more human question: what might technology make possible when it gives people more freedom to create, experiment and pursue what matters to them? That vision came to life at Kraftwerk, where the company premiered its new short film and global campaign in collaboration with Reference Studios during Berlin Art Week. The evening also featured live performances by Actress, whose experimental electronic sound moves between club music and avant-garde composition, and Sega Bodega, whose genre-defying work spans music, fashion and visual art. For Joel Evey, Cohere’s VP of Brand, the connection between technology and creativity is instinctive. A Brooklyn-based creative director, artist and educator, Evey has previously worked at Meta, Grailed and Gap. At Cohere, he is helping shape a more human, culturally connected vision of AI. Nick Frosst, Cohere co-founder and former Google Brain researcher, has witnessed the evolution of AI from an emerging field into a defining technology. Today, he is focused on how AI can be developed and used in ways that give organisations greater control while keeping human creativity and judgment at the centre. We spoke to Evey and Frosst about creativity, culture, Berlin and the possibility of making AI a tool that gives people more freedom to pursue what they love.

Billy Burrell: Cohere’s ‘Convergence’ event at Berlin’s Kraftwerk brought AI into one of the city’s most iconic cultural spaces, with live performances from Actress and Sega Bodega. Why was it important for you to introduce Cohere through music and creative culture, rather than a conventional tech setting?

Joel Evey: I grew up with the early internet, when technology and creativity were the same scene. That’s the version I still believe in. Kraftwerk felt like the perfect place to bring that spirit to life. Cohere is deeply pro-human, and Convergence reflected our belief that when AI takes care of the tedious work, people have more freedom to focus on what they love. We think AI is only useful if it empowers people, that’s why we are focused on building models that automate boring work, and allow people to be more creative, not less

“When AI takes care of the tedious work, people have more freedom to focus on what they love.”

BB: Berlin is a hedonistic city where subcultures collide and new ideas emerge. What does it represent to Cohere, and what did you want ‘Convergence’ to say about the company?

JE: We are growing in Germany and we really respect the culture and art scene here. At Cohere, we believe there’s enormous value in bringing people with different perspectives together. It creates conversations that challenge assumptions and open up new ideas. Berlin felt like a natural place for that. It has always embraced experimentation, different cultures and subcultures which is exactly the kind of environment where new ideas can emerge.

BB: Nick, what’s different about today’s AI conversation from what you imagined when you joined Geoffrey Hinton as his first hire at Google Brain? Has the reality of where AI has ended up surprised you?

Nick Frosst: When I started with Geoffrey, AI was still a small research field. The big question was simply whether these techniques would work at all. What’s changed is that AI has moved from a research challenge to critical infrastructure. The conversation is now much bigger, about trust, security, economic impact and, importantly, who controls the technology. That shift has made the role of places like Europe much more important. Europe has world-class talent, industries and institutions, and should have a meaningful role in shaping how AI is built and deployed rather than simply relying on technology developed elsewhere.

BB: You’ve spoken about a future where AI becomes “boring” infrastructure, something that simply works in the background. Does a culturally charged event like ‘Convergence’ sit in tension with that idea, or are the two actually connected?

NF:  They’re actually connected. When I talk about AI becoming “boring” infrastructure, I mean it should simply work, for example taking care of repetitive, time-consuming tasks so people can focus on doing what they enjoy. That applies to culture too. AI should be another tool for artists and creators to use, challenge and reinterpret and definitely not something that replaces human creativity and talent.

“AI should be another tool for artists and creators to use, challenge and reinterpret.”

BB: Cohere has positioned itself differently from some of the dominant Silicon Valley AI companies. What do you think Cohere sees differently?

NF: We started from a different premise. Rather than simply making bigger models, we’ve focused on making AI useful, open, and relevant to organisations and the people they serve. That means giving organisations choice and control over how AI is deployed and where their data goes. We don’t think such an important technology should be controlled by a handful of companies or a single geography.

BB: Joel, Cohere’s visual identity feels quite different from the way we usually see AI represented. How important was it to create a brand that feels human and connected to culture, rather than futuristic or overly technical?

JE: Very. We’re operating at the frontier of technology, but we also want to engage with the frontier of creativity and culture, where many new ideas emerge. We never wanted Cohere to look like a stereotypical AI company. The technology we build is ultimately about people and organisations solving real problems in the real world.

BB: AI is already changing the way we work, create and communicate. What do you think we’re still getting wrong about its impact on culture, and what are you most curious to see humans do with it?

JE: I think we often see AI as subtractive, rather than additive. We’ve seen this before with tools like Adobe. Lowering the barrier to creation didn’t kill creativity; it gave more people the ability to create. I’m excited to see AI become another tool in the creative toolbox, helping people explore ideas, experiment faster and bring things to life.

“Lowering the barrier to creation didn’t kill creativity; it gave more people the ability to create.”
]]>