Essays – Numéro Berlin https://www.numeroberlin.de Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:03:31 +0000 en-US hourly 1 BUFF MEDICAL RESORT: WHERE MEDICINE, INNOVATION AND LUXURY MEET https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/09/buff-mecdical-resort-where-medicine-innovation-and-luxury-meet/ Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:28:55 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=64138

A New Vision of Health

On a mission to set new standards in preventive and regenerative medicine – experienced through the lens of five-star luxury – the new Buff Medical Resort is shaping bold visions for the future of health.

 

 Located on the sun-drenched southern shore of Lake Constance, nestled within a 40,000-square-meter park of centuries-old trees, the exclusive resort rises as a place where health, luxury, and high-tech medicine converge like never before. “I want to die healthy, at 120,” says Hans Jürg Buff, founder and CEO, in a calm, deep voice as we sit in the bright lounge overlooking the sparkling lake. A seasoned hotelier and investor, Buff brings decades of entrepreneurial experience into this pioneering project. The resort’s mission goes far beyond prolonging life: it’s about empowering people to live more consciously, healthily, and self-determined.

Here, a diverse team of experts challenges traditional wellness concepts. Instead of simply offering relaxation, Buff Medical Resort combines cutting-edge medical diagnostics, regenerative medicine, and ancient healing knowledge – including traditional Indian Ayurveda – into one integrative approach. “For me, the task of medicine is to ensure people stay healthy, not wait until they’re sick to make them slightly less sick,” explains Dr. Claas Hohmann, the resort’s medical director. His enthusiasm is palpable, whether in one-on-one conversations or during intimate evening lectures. His years of experience have convinced him that much more can – and must – be done.

A Different Kind of Luxury: High-Tech Meets Holism

My Bentley pick-up from Zurich airport set the tone immediately: luxury with uncompromising attention to detail. But Buff is not about superficial distractions. Everything here is meticulously curated with clear, honest intent – starting with the construction itself: At Buff, sophisticated and sustainable design meets medical precision: toxin-free solid wood, metal-free grounded beds, cotton plaster for optimal indoor climate, and bathtubs with park and lake views. “Our guests should truly unwind, reconnect with themselves, and regain energy,” says Buff. Even Wi-Fi is turned off at night for digital detox.

The rooms, starting at 28 square meters and ranging up to the 350-square-meter presidential suite, feel light and airy. Each  suite comes with its own sauna. Wellness lovers will find steam and bio-saunas, an infrared sauna, an Aqua-Shiatsu pool, Kneipp baths, an ice bath, and even a marine-climate graduation house with salt aerosols.

From my junior suite, I look out over the 25-meter outdoor infinity pool, facing Lake Constance. The resort is also an art space, housing a collection of paintings by Konstanz-born artist Hans Breinlinger. The expansive conference room is Buff’s personal sanctuary: “This is my little chapel,” he whispers, a nod to his deep religious life. “The idea of fasting is ancient – it is already suggested in the Bible.” Sundays are reserved as family days, when Buff barely works. For him, commitment begins with small rituals.

 

The creation of Buff Medical Resort is a story of vision and courage. Over ten years ago, Hans Jürg Buff, a long time hotelier and investor,  bought the property and gathered a team of doctors, therapists, and designers who shared his philosophy. His initiative also grew from frustration with other medical resorts. “I can do this better,” he decided. Almost 100 million euros later, Buff Medical Resort now unites luxury, science, and ancient healing traditions, setting new standards for preventive and regenerative medicine.

“I want to do something honest,” says Buff. And it shows – from toxin-free materials to personalized health programs. No unnecessary excess: even hair conditioner is absent, a reminder that the resort is not about indulgence but about conscious, valuable experiences. Programs range from three to 21 days, customizable from fasting to vitality packages to advanced high-intensity programs, designed to improve gut health, enhance performance, and include extensive diagnostics for assessing cardiovascular risk. Prices start at €3,000, including the F.X. Mayr package, and increase up to €50,000 for extended stays – including accommodation and full board.

Buff himself has experimented with fasting and methylene blue therapy for decades, pushing the boundaries of bodily regeneration. “I would never have invested so much at my age if I didn’t fully believe in it,” he says. But he does believe – and his team is prepared for any guest, from wellness seekers to heads of state. The presidential suite comes with bulletproof windows, its own elevator and entrance, and ample space for family and friends. 

A Place for Awareness

Buff Medical Resort is not a typical luxury wellness hotel. It’s a place where guests learn to eat mindfully, sleep properly, move consciously, and reduce stress. “It’s not just about treatments. It’s about giving people something they can take home,” Buff emphasizes.

Mindful eating plays a central role: eating alone, chewing each bite 40 times to sharpen body awareness. Prevention over reaction is the guiding principle. Guests undergo holistic assessments – cardiovascular, muscular, mobility, and gut health – followed by individually tailored programs. Aftercare packages continue beyond the stay, with check-ins monthly or quarterly and direct medical access if needed. “In my ideal vision, guests come here three weeks a year and learn so much they don’t have to come back,” Buff says. Hardly the most lucrative business model – but his focus is on global impact, not profit margins. 

Four Pillars of Holistic Health

Buff Medical Resort’s philosophy rests on four pillars:  


Firstly, there is the Altitude Climate Technology: All rooms can simulate altitudes up to 2,000 meters by reducing oxygen levels, supporting regeneration, metabolism, and cardiovascular health.  Secondly, we have the Cardiac MRI: A non-invasive, state-of-the-art diagnostics detect risks early and enable individualized treatment.  Then there is the resort’s core: The F.X. Mayr Medicine & Gut Health: Fasting medicine is the key here, cleansing and strengthening the immune system in close collaboration with doctors and nutritionists.  Then last but not least: Gait & Muscle Health: Innovative analysis and training programs correct imbalances and restore strength.

Complementary therapies include Ayurveda, yoga, meditation, Pilates, osteopathy, and extensive spa treatments. My personal highlight: two osteopathy sessions that finally freed me from two years of hernia pain.  Although the medical infrastructure is impressive – including a state-of-the-art MRI – exclusively owned and all done inhouse –  high-performance cycling ergometers, and individually controlled altitude rooms – the human being remains the focus. “We combine the latest technology with human presence. It’s medicine that sees, senses, and understands people,” explains Dr. Hohmann.

Healing Gourmet and a Reflecting on our unnatural Lifestyle

Food at Buff is healing, too. Portions are small but intentional, following F.X. Mayr principles. “We avoid coffee, sugar, and mostly gluten – but we don’t categorically exclude food. We work as locally as possible,” says head chef Marcus Zillmann, who brings 20 years of star-restaurant experience. Even the homemade “chewing trainer biscuit” reminds guests of the forgotten art of chewing: digestion starts in the mouth, as Dr. Hohmann explains.


Yes, a stay at Buff equals the price of a small car – far more than a cruise. But what guests receive is not a holiday, but a catalyst for fundamental lifestyle change.  “Animals, when unwell, stop eating, rest, and let their bodies heal. Humans, instead, pile on medication, stress, food, alcohol. We’ve lost touch with simplicity,” says Hohmann. He’s right. Within hours of arriving, my caffeine cravings overwhelmed me. But Buff was clear: “This is no wellness trip.” Guests must commit – and that is precisely what makes change possible.

Back to the roots, back to simplicity: this is what Buff teaches, and what modern life has made us forget. In a world addicted to symptom treatments, Buff Medical Resort stands as a rare luxury: costly, yes – but offering something far more valuable: holistic, enduring richness.

]]>
AN OPINION ON NOTHING’S HEADPHONE (1) https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/09/an-opinion-on-nothings-headphone-1/ Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:25:19 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=63606 Nothing comes close to the perfect pair of over-ear headphones (pun intended)

… well, at least regarding the headphone’s design. The Headphone (1), as they are called, are both bold and beautiful to look at. Reminiscent of cassette-tapes from the 80s, the Headphone (1) feature a striking, transparent design that is unmistakable Nothing. But… what makes something Nothing?

 

Nothing is a British consumer electronics brand based in London. It was founded in 2020 by Carl Pei, the co-founder of the well-known smartphone manufacturer OnePlus. Nothing’s philosophy is to develop products that combine simplicity, transparency, and distinctive design at an affordable price. And so far in their young company history, it’s widely acknowledged they have been successful with their approach. In a field often called out for its lacking user-feedback integration, Nothing sets out to provide user-first experiences. Whether that be through smartphones, smart-watches or headphones – they stick close to their community’s wishes and listen to feedback.

Amidst the rapid, ever-changing tech-industry, Nothing manages to stay true to its core principles. With the Headphone (1), they challenge their iconic design-language in innovative ways while adhering to their heritage’s inspiration, Teenage Engineering. Handled by some as the design-first tech-company of the 21st century, their timeless, industrial inspired design calls back to the 1980s. Beautiful, functional and intuitive. – Just like Nothing’s products. Teenage Engineering isn’t the only brand that influenced the design of Headphone (1) though. Global Design Director at Nothing, Adam Bates, worked many years as Head of Design at Dyson. The company mainly known for their vacuums gained a lot of recognition for their beautiful and durable industrial design. Adam Bates made it his mission to continue developing appealing, functional products when he joined Nothing in 2022. And appealing and functional products he developed!

Back to the Headphone (1): Of course, design isn’t everything, but even when focusing solely on the features and specs, the company’s first entry into the over-ear headphone market doesn’t disappoint in the slightest. They feature an ambitious sound profile, developed in cooperation with British speaker manufacturer KEF. Even though the quality is by no means perfect, it fits the expectations coming from a 300€ pair of over-ear noise-canceling headphones. And the added bonus of an integrated equalizer in the dedicated app makes for a flawless adjustment of the sound, whenever needed. As a cherry on top, the Headphone (1) feature a broad pallet of quality-of-life features, like intuitive button-controls on the outside, a transparency mode and support for spatial audio.

Considering the style-factor of the headphones, Nothing managed to create a package, worthy of competing with the best of the best in the high-end over-ear headphone market. But really, the main selling point of the Headphone (1) is their design…– We are excited to see what is next for Nothing‘s headphones. The industry needs more innovative companies, that challenge the given and question the status quo. When happening in terms of product-design, even better!

 

]]>
Numéro Berlin Travel Review https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/08/numero-berlin-travel-review/ Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:45:04 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=62494 The Art of Breathing Space — Remote Luxury and Ancient Resonance

 

In an age of accelerating schedules and aesthetic overload, true luxury often reveals itself not in forced extravagance, but in spaciousness that leaves room for choices. Along the glistening curve of Turkey’s southern coast, nestled beside pine forests and the Mediterranean Sea, the Ali Bey Resort Sorgun offers a version of luxury that is less about spectacle and more about alignment—between body and pace, design and ecology, past and present.

 

An organized jungle

 

It is late when I arrive at the reception hall, a big space that mixes tradition with modern design. Here, Turkish hospitality starts at its finest: A golf cart picks me up to drive me to my room, driving down the beautiful tree-framed paths that almost feel like an „organized jungle“ in the darkness. The peaceful pace and energy remains the same in the morning, despite all guest and families that have slowly openend the vacation season that comes with many activities as well.

Built in 2010 by a Turkish family-owned group, the resort unfolds across 120,000 square meters of gardens and wooded terrain. It feels less like a hotel complex and more like a cultivated ecosystem—one where architecture, nature, and time are allowed to breathe. No trees were cut during the construction of the pools; the topography was followed rather than forced. The result is a landscape of quiet elegance: stone pathways between olive trees, curved waterlines that echo natural springs, shaded corners that invite stillness.

 

A dive into rich history

 

Yet to truly understand the emotional depth of this place, one must consider its setting: Side, one of the Mediterranean’s oldest and most storied cities. Founded by Greek settlers around the 7th century BCE, Side became a thriving Roman port and a cultural melting pot of the ancient world. It was here that Antony and Cleopatra once anchored their ships; here that temples rose in devotion to Apollo and Athena, gods of sun and wisdom. Today, the ruins remain: a vast amphitheater carved into the earth, half-buried bathhouses, stone-paved roads leading to colonnades now softened by centuries of wind and salt. A short drive from the resort, the Side Museum offers one of the most quietly powerful historical encounters in the region. Housed in a former Roman bath, the museum displays sarcophagi, reliefs, and statues unearthed in the surrounding area—many left in situ, touched by time rather than removed from it. Here, history is not staged behind glass but embedded in atmosphere. It is not uncommon to stand before a 2,000-year-old lion sculpture and hear nothing but cicadas.

This subtle sense of continuity—between the ancient and the immediate—is what gives the Ali Bey Resort Sorgun its particular rhythm. Built in 2010 it now counts 429 rooms and suits, protecting sufficient privacy in 12 different buildings.

While the resort is fully modern in its offerings—Ultra All-Inclusive, four à-la-carte restaurants, a sprawling Samara Spa—it never feels severed from its surroundings. The Spa  – a signature for the resort group – follows the same vision too: mixing traditions with modern approaches, offering exclusive treatments such as Aromatherapy, Bali and Thai Massages but also a Turkish bath and saunas on four levels and 2000 square meters.

 

The experience of space

 

There is a tangible gentleness in how space is used and offered: quiet zones by the pool, hidden reading nooks and natural materials that echo the terrain. This all exists right next to a whole different reality for those who seek adventure and action: fitness or dance classes or – above – a dedicated place for tennis lovers, no matter if on professional or amateur level.With 91 courts, the Ali Bey Hotels & Resorts group counts to one of the biggest tennis centers in the world, hosting many national and international tournaments. The Sorgun resort alone has 37 courts including three children’s courts providing a dedicated service.

But back to the silence seeker: Remote workers, in particular, such as me who had come with a bag full of work, will find a kind of rare generosity here. With generous Wi-Fi – really everywhere, even at the beach – shaded garden spaces, and an atmosphere that encourages pacing rather than urgency, the resort is surprisingly conducive to creative focus. You can write beneath the trees, take calls between olive branches snacking the best turkish delights and tea, breathing in sea air to then submerge into silence again before taking a sunset yoga and stretching class facing the beach. The contrast is healing. But also the resort’s service speaks of excellence: A recent guest was complaining about not being able to have any wish left, what an overwhelming condition.

Sustainability, too, is more than a buzzword here—it is embedded in both design and operation. Beyond the ecological landscaping, long-term partnerships with local producers, and material longevity, there’s a palpable care for slowness, continuity, and conscious use. Even the gastronomic experience leans into seasonal produce, from Anatolian dishes to teppanyaki served by the sea. But the restaurant really offers something for anyone on a high quality despite it being  All-Inclusive.

Families are welcomed without compromise. Children’s programs are held in nature, not on screens, offering highlights as their famous waterpark. Entertainment takes place under stars, with live music and storytelling instead of artificial spectacle. And always, just beyond the resort, the outlines of ancient Side remain—reminding guests that luxury is not a break from history, but perhaps a quiet conversation with it. Some might here it louder, others might need to listen a little bit longer.

Ali Bey Resort Sorgun is not a minimalist retreat, nor a maximalist stage. It is something rarer: a space of balance—between leisure and purpose, family and solitude, design and nature, past and present. To stay here is not to escape, but to return: to a slower pace, to a grounded rhythm, to a setting where even the silence seems to hold memory.

]]>
#ZUKUNFT: “THE FUTURE BECOMES YOU” – WORDS BY LIAM CAGNEY https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/01/zukunft-the-future-becomes-you-words-by-liam-cagney/ Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:00:49 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57062

If, like me, you’re a techno head—wedded to dark dancefloors, addicted to sonorous strangeness—chances are, you’ve heard of the book Future Shock. Published in 1970, penned by husband-and-wife duo Alvin and Heidi Toffler (herein, when I say “Toffler,” I mean both authors) and selling millions of copies, Future Shock is a book that Detroit techno’s founding group Cybotron read and which supposedly fired their artistic imaginations. “Alvin Toffler’s book is a kind of bible to Detroit’s new musical revolutionaries,” noted John McCready in 1988 in the NME (indulging in hyperbole).

The term techno was already bouncing around the global musical grid by the early 1980s. But the term’s appearance in Toffler’s follow-up book, The Third Wave, chimed with and validated the emerging electronic music genre: “The techno rebels are, whether they recognize it or not, agents of the third wave,” wrote Toffler. “They will not vanish but multiply in the years ahead. For they are as much a part of the advance to a new stage of civilization as our missions to Venus, our amazing computers, our biological discoveries, or our explorations of the oceanic depths.” A seductive idea, but decades later, how does it fare? In this jaded age of ours, while our planet burns and the dancefloor distracts, what can Future Shock still tell us?
Future visions always reflect the person doing the prediction. For the tweedy English gentleman Arthur C. Clarke, the future is about humanity’s imperial encounters in outer space. For the drug-addled vagabond Philip K. Dick, the future means inane advertisements being beamed directly into your brain and not knowing whether or not you’re actually real. For the Queer Black outsider Octavia Butler, the future involves the mutant biological blending of humans and aliens. These are science fiction authors, but between science fiction and futurist analysis, there’s a fine line, with speculation in common.
Toffler was of the privileged class of WASPs, well educated and with a background in business and journalism. Future Shock reads like the jottings of a lofty MD, the type of sensible doctor who golfs on the weekends at the country club, the trusty gent to whom concerned postwar American parents turned when their little son Billy began exhibiting worrying signs of unsavouy homosexual urges, and who would sagely prescribe Billy a thorough course of electroshock therapy. “The basic thrust of this book is diagnosis,” Toffler writes, guiding Americans through the worrying world of tomorrow.

Toffler as guide describes built-in obsolescence, modular architecture, consumerist fads, style tribes, unorthodox families. Toffler describes how we will live under the sea, weather manipulation on a global scale, “research into communication between man and dolphin,” generating new species of bacteria, synthetic body parts, cloning, choosing your embryo’s sex and personality, cyborgs. The future is a disconcerting concatenation of phenomena arising, more or less, from the revolutions in communications technology, which Toffler diagnoses and prognosticates upon.
A notable feature of Future Shock is its air of seductive exoticism. “We who explore the future are like those ancient mapmakers,” Toffler writes proudly, savoring “new realities, filled with danger and promise, created by the accelerative thrust.” The future is a strange country full of unsettling customs. As such, Future Shock is at times an escape from a mundane present into a world of romantic fantasy, of teleportation, telepathy, cloning, eternal life, bodily augmentation: futurist analysis as a branch of supernatural literature.

Future Shock is also prescient. It accurately foresees the so-called experience economy (“One important class of experiential products will be based on simulated environments that offer the customer a taste of adventure, danger, sexual titillation or other pleasure without risk to his real life or reputation”—escape rooms, Meta and so on), remarking correctly that it “is clearly foreshadowed in the participatory techniques now being pioneered in the arts” (such as hippie happenings). In art, Future Shock observes a shift away from the classical arts towards immersive multisensory experiences: “Artists also have begun to create whole ‘environments’—works of art into which the audience may actually walk, and inside which things happen… The artists who produce these are really ‘experiential engineers.’” Which is basically the 2020s techno club.

“The future is like a weird alien virus infecting the public body, mutating all the cells of human society, rendering alien and dysmorphic the human self as hitherto known.”

Much of Future Shock is a lengthy footnote to the 1960s cultural revolution. “There are rich men who playact poverty, computer programmers who turn on with LSD. There are anarchists who, beneath their dirty denim shirts, are outrageous conformists, and conformists who, beneath their button-down collars, are outrageous anarchists. There are married priests and atheist ministers and Jewish Zen Buddhists… There are Playboy Clubs and homosexual movie theaters… amphetamines and tranquilizers… anger, affluence, and oblivion. Much oblivion.” The future is like a weird alien virus infecting the public body, mutating all the cells of human society, rendering alien and dysmorphic the human self as hitherto known.

Placating us, taking seriously their self-appointed job to tell us what all this means, Toffler presents this explosion of the future as a surface symptom of a deep structural change, the transition from one technological age to another. For Toffler, humanity has been defined by three waves: The first wave was agrarian humanity; the second wave was industrial humanity; and the third wave—the future exploding so strangely around us—is superindustrial humanity. Others have called the latter post-Fordist or postindustrial society, an economy no longer based on manufacturing but on services, no longer based on things but on information, a globalized world networked by information technology.

“The inhabitants of the earth are divided not only by race, nation, religion or ideology, but also, in a sense, by their position in time.”

“The inhabitants of the earth are divided not only by race, nation, religion or ideology, but also, in a sense, by their position in time,” Future Shock states. “Examining the present populations of the globe, we find a tiny group who still live, hunting and food-foraging, as men did millennia ago. Others, the vast majority of mankind, depend not on bear-hunting or berry-picking, but on agriculture.” In this view, all wars are effectively wars between different waves. Toffler describes the West as a system in a state of disequilibrium, waiting to settle again into a steady state. Adaptation will be key, informed by understanding.

Toffler is particularly focused on how modern society’s exhausting sense of endless transience affects our sense of self and of social connections. For Toffler, the twentieth century Western world’s explosion of consumer goods is one of the main indices for the third wave’s accelerated rate of change. We ourselves might measure the changing rate of change through the ubiquity of smartphones, the personal computers through which we mediate and zombify ourselves. Only ten years ago, not everyone had one, but now, it seems unimaginable that things were ever any different. The rapid change could not but leave some feeling existentially fraught, daunted by how suddenly our inner lives have been surrendered to surveillance capitalism.

“Future shock is the “shattering stress and disorientation that we induce in individuals by subjecting them to too much change in too short a time.””

Which brings in Toffler’s most famous concept, the titular future shock. “Future shock,” Toffler writes, is the “shattering stress and disorientation that we induce in individuals by subjecting them to too much change in too short a time.” The neologism is coined by analogy with culture shock, what happens to a Westerner when they fly to a far-flung place and throw themselves into a completely foreign culture, Delhi, say, to head-spinning effect. Psychologist Sven Lundstedt defined culture shock as a “form of personality maladjustment which is a reaction to a temporarily unsuccessful attempt to adjust to new surroundings and people.” Expanding on this, Toffler defines future shock as “what happens when the familiar psychological cues that help an individual to function in society are suddenly withdrawn and replaced by new ones that are strange or incomprehensible.’

For the future-shocked person, “the strange society may itself be changing only very slowly, yet for him it is all new. Signs, sounds and other psychological cues rush past him before he can grasp their meaning. The entire experience takes on a surrealistic air. Every word, every action is shot through with uncertainty. In this setting, fatigue arrives more quickly than usual.” Acceleration, change and adaptation are key concepts assumed by this framework. Through providing an explanation of what’s going on at a deep structural level, Future Shock helps Joe and Jane Middle America adapt and regain stability amidst the typhoon of transformation. “The problem is not, therefore, to suppress change, which cannot be done, but to manage it. If we opt for rapid change in certain sectors of life, we can consciously attempt to build stability zones elsewhere.” And, indeed, to capitalize on it: one of Toffler’s later books is called Revolutionary Wealth: How It Will Be Created and How It Will Change Our Lives.

As I close Future Shock’s covers, my main takeaway is a contrary view. I am not a past person forced to live in an environment of the future; I am a future person forced to live within the environment of the past. I have past shock. The tyranny of the everyday—of conventional national identity, sexuality identity, gender identity, personhood at all in the first place—is completely bewildering. It has shocked me my whole life. I do not want to absorb the future into the everyday and thus to tame it: I want to be drained of all pastness and absorbed into a futurity that can never be contained within any earthly roots.

Techno helps me to do that. Within the club’s darkness—through immersion in flickering lights and out-there sounds and rhythms like insect heartbeats—techno envelops you in silence. Then, techno whispers that yes, what you feel despite it all is real, that history is madness and selfhood a fantasy. If a techno set by, say, Jeff Mills provokes shock in us—shock at its relentless strangeness, through its insane electronic loops—it is a shock we should embrace, recognizing as it does our real self, our future self.

]]>
#ZUKUNFT: “THE FUTURE OF THE PAST: THE FATE OF SCREEN HERITAGE IN A DIGITAL WORLD” – WORDS BY HARRY PASEK https://www.numeroberlin.de/2025/01/zukunft-the-future-of-the-past-the-fate-of-screen-heritage-in-a-digital-world-words-by-harry-pasek/ Tue, 21 Jan 2025 12:55:32 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=57093

It is a warm evening in June, and I am sitting in the cinema. The auditorium is full, the audience is a lively and diverse mixture of cinema-goers both young and old, and there is a distinct murmur of excitement in the room. The reason is that we are at the opening night of a new film festival, the BFI Film on Film Festival, at BFI Southbank (British Film Institute) in London.

The festival does what it says on the tin: Every single film screening across a long weekend is being shown on physical film rather than being digitally projected (as is now the norm in almost every cinema in the world). We are waiting to see a print of the classic 1945 melodrama noir, Mildred Pierce, cause for excitement in itself, but this screening is special because we are to view the great film on an original release nitrate print.

Nitrate film is extremely flammable and explosive, to the extent that it can cause catastrophic, lethal damage if mishandled. In May 1897, the Paris Bazaar disaster was caused by a nitrate fire, claiming 126 lives. This terrible event came early in cinema’s history (the first moving images were captured by the Lumière brothers in 1895), and led to a rush of regulation and legislation, as well as technical innovation. By 1948, a non-flammable alternative, acetate safety film, began to supplant its predecessor. This screening of Mildred Pierce is the first screening of a nitrate film print in the UK for a decade, and BFI Southbank is the only venue in the country that can legally screen these increasingly rare and potentially dangerous artefacts.

Robin Baker, the Head Curator of the BFI National Archive and the festival’s lead programmer, steps onto the stage to introduce the new festival and the not-so-new film. As he does so, he looks a little perturbed. Diplomatically, he explains that during testing, the skilled team of projectionists noticed an issue with the projector which meant that safety couldn’t be absolutely guaranteed. There will be no nitrate screening this evening. Handily, however, the BFI has created a brand new 35mm acetate print of the film which can be shown instead. Understandably disappointed, the audience lets the news wash over them. Once the lights go down and the projector whirrs into action, nobody seems to mind.

The moving image is by some distance the most pervasive cultural form in the world. In the smartphone and streaming age, it is everywhere, instantly, all the time. We are exposed to it whether we like it or not. Given the perception of instant access to the entire wealth of human culture, what is a festival like Film on Film trying to achieve? More importantly, why did thousands of people come to view battered old prints of forgotten films on a warm weekend in early summer in London?

In a sense, the answer is simple. Because it is possible to view an awful lot of content wherever and whenever we want, it’s easy to believe that we have access to everything. In truth, we absolutely do not. Though streaming platforms sell us infinite choice, in reality, only a proportionally small handful of the history of cinema is available to view digitally. Most films only exist on celluloid. If you cannot project them on film, you can’t see them at all. The issue goes deeper still: Approximately 80% of all films made before the year 1930 are currently completely lost, unavailable to view in any format. Your average Netflix subscriber may not mourn the loss of the last viewable print of a 1923 German Expressionist oddity, but that’s not to say that it isn’t a valuable historical document, or indeed an important aesthetic statement that deserves preservation.

Almost all of the films shown at the festival came from the extensive collection of the BFI National Archive, one of a number of globally significant film archives, alongside others such as the Cinémathèque Française and the UCLA Film & Television Archive, who preserve, curate and restore screen heritage. Without these organizations, our access to the work of even famous filmmakers would be cast into doubt. In 2012, a project by the BFI National Archive restored Alfred Hitchcock’s first nine silent feature films, none of which were viewable prior to this work.

People want to see films that they can’t see anywhere else, but they also want to experience a film print projected, with an audience, because that is how the filmmaker intended the work to be seen. BFI Film on Film Festival showed a lot of underappreciated classics, but on its closing night, it also screened an original release print of Jaws, complete with the original mono soundtrack. Despite being a film that can absolutely be seen at the click of a button, the screening sold out fast, perhaps because people wanted to experience the film as it had been seen upon release. Through the print they were shown, that audience was linked to the audiences who saw the very same print in the summer of 1978: a continuity of experience through time, transmuted through acetate and light and thrown into the ether.

If a film was made before the turn of the millennium, chances are that the filmmaker shot it on film, and expected the work to be exhibited in cinemas on film prints. A digital rendering is not better or worse than celluloid, but it is crucially different. On film, the focus may be slightly softer, the grain of the image may be more apparent. Over time and with repeated use, slight movements in the frame or imperfections may become visible. Anecdotally, when DCPs (Digital Cinema Packages) began to replace film prints in cinemas, some projectionists thought that there was something wrong with the digital images they were seeing: The sharpness of the image and smoothed movement had rendered the old magic of cinema eerie and uncanny.

There is now a whole generation of film viewers who may never have the opportunity to see a film physically projected. It’s no wonder that demand for this experience is high. While the global casualization of film watching habits continues, it is important for organizations with a platform to advocate for the value of the cinematic experience. Currently, only one other film festival in the world screens exclusively on film: The Nitrate Picture Show, held at the Eastman Museum in Rochester, New York.

As a new generation of cinephiles looks to engage with the history of the medium, perhaps the Film on Film Festival will be the beginning of a broader movement towards an analogue experience of cinema. The festival’s organizers have pointed to the vinyl revival of the last decade as another example of largely young people searching for something authentic, tangible and physical amid the onslaught of digital consumption. The nuanced aesthetic differences between listening to a record and, say, streaming it on Spotify are mirrored in the even richer, audiovisual experience of celluloid film.

Engaging with the materiality of film also raises the question of preservation. As the amount of ‘born digital’ content swells daily, most of it held within a variety of proprietorial fiefdoms, the challenge of how to effectively catalogue and preserve digital moving image materials becomes ever greater. Organizations such as the Internet Archive continue to fight the good fight in preserving digital heritage and advocating for a free and open internet, but while it may have success in doing the former, the dream of open access has largely died.

Many people implicitly believe that preserving digital materials is both easier and safer than preserving physical film or paper collections, for instance, but this is not the case. If Netflix or YouTube were to disappear tomorrow, none of the content they hold would have its safety guaranteed, and could disappear much more easily than an ageing film canister. To begin the hard and ongoing work of countering these risks, the BFI National Archive has struck a deal with major streaming platforms including Netflix and Amazon to preserve key British material from their collections. The agreement ensures that whatever the long-term fate of the companies, these materials will be safe for future generations to interpret. This is the first such deal of its kind globally, but other organizations will be looking to follow suit. As the amount of potentially at-risk content increases, the issue becomes ever more pressing.

Back at the festival, the sometimes precarious balance between preservation and access was thrown into sharp relief by a couple of screenings. One of these was Charlie Shackleton’s The Afterlight. Only one print of this film exists, and it tours cinemas along with its director. Every film print has a finite lifespan, a limited number of times that it can be screened, and by only creating one print of his film, Shackleton plays with our formal expectations of cinema, which, along with still photography, was the first art form to develop with the expectation of indefinite reproduction. By enforcing scarcity, seeing a screening of The Afterlight is to be reminded of the ephemerality of experience, and to leave with a newfound appreciation for the act of watching. It forces the question of how our viewing might differ if we knew we could never see the images again.

To emphasize this point, the screening of 1968’s The Swimmer was determined to be the last time this particular cinematic release print of the film could be publicly exhibited. The print has now returned to the BFI National Archive for safekeeping, but its quality has deteriorated to the point that running the reels through a projector for an audience would carry too high a risk of permanent damage. A cult adaptation of the 1964 short story by John Cheever, starring Burt Lancaster, the festival audience watched the film in the knowledge that no one else would be able to see this particular print ever again.

Both of these screenings point to the increased contextual pleasure, and complexity of emotion, that can be gained from appreciating both the form and content of a physically projected film. The festival celebrated the films themselves and the stories being told. It also served as a timely reminder of the importance of the artefact of the print, and what a specific print (and its story) can bring to the experience of film viewing.

For the disappointed opening night crowd who were denied their nitrate fix, the last day of the festival brought happier news, when the planned nitrate screening of the 1941 Technicolor curio Blood and Sand, starring one Rita Hayworth, went ahead as planned, with no injuries reported. The festival had brought like-minded film lovers together to experience something unique, in many cases, for the first time. One of the most striking observations from across the weekend was the strong and continued presence of younger people, turning out in great numbers to see physical film. Streaming platforms aren’t going anywhere, but neither is the desire to get together and engage with art. The enthusiasm for a communal, analogue experience gives hope for the future of the cinematic experience more broadly: an experience whose obituary has been prematurely written by every generation since its birth.

]]>
#PASSION: BETWEEN PASSION AND APATHY https://www.numeroberlin.de/2024/11/passion-between-passion-and-apathy/ Mon, 04 Nov 2024 09:29:15 +0000 https://www.numeroberlin.de/?p=53951

According to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, in 2020, only 21% of Americans trust the government to do what is right most of the time. That’s a pretty damning statistic. In light of that, for most people, there is a choice – to engage or dissociate entirely. Of course, there’s always fulfillment in the world of work. Gallup research showed that employees who are passionate about their work are a whopping 2.5 times more likely to be engaged. It’s times like this that we all remember the classic high-school yearbook prompt: most likely to be economically engaged.

 The issue here is that most people’s jobs are trash. In Bullshit Jobs: A Theory, David Graeber says that many individuals find themselves in roles that lack purpose or meaning. In an era of economic precarity, job insecurity, and the inability to own a home, late millennials and Gen Z grapple with jobs that provide little fulfillment or stability. Social and cultural apathy, influenced by social media, the pandemic, and political intensity, has fostered disconnection, anti-social behavior, and a declining birth rate.

In a world shaped by unprecedented challenges and dynamic changes, the emotional responses of individuals have evolved into a complex interplay between passion and apathy. These two contrasting forces have become defining features of our time, shaping how people engage with the world around them.

A DRIVING FORCE FOR CHANGE

A vibrant and powerful emotion, passion has always proved to be a driving force for transformative movements and activism. Think Greta Thunberg and global climate strikes leading to a commitment to environmental causes that transcend generational boundaries. Or, the 2020 elections in the United States stand as a testament to passionate civic engagement, with increased voter turnout reflecting a commitment to shaping the political landscape for the better.

Emotionally, passion brings forth feelings of excitement, joy and fulfillment. Psychologically, it propels individuals and societies to set and achieve meaningful goals, fostering resilience and personal growth. Behaviorally, passionate individuals actively engage in their chosen pursuits, investing time and effort to make a tangible impact.

In our exploration of passion, it is essential to acknowledge the potential pitfalls that can arise when enthusiasm becomes overwhelming. While passion is generally hailed as a positive force propelling individuals toward their goals, an unbridled and all-consuming fervor can lead to burnout and adverse effects on mental well-being. The dangers lie in the relentless pursuit of perfection, self-imposed pressures, and the disregard for personal boundaries. Interviews with professionals across various fields will shed light on their experiences with burnout, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a healthy balance between passion and self-care. It’s a cautionary tale that highlights the need for individuals to tread carefully along the line between unwavering dedication and the preservation of their mental and physical health.

Yet, amidst the fervor of passion, a not-so-silent undertow of apathy has permeated certain aspects of society. Characterized by a lack of interest and emotional detachment, apathy has manifested in various forms, contributing to a sense of disillusionment.

Apathy’s grip extends beyond personal disinterest; it permeates societal structures, contributing to a lack of engagement and fostering a pervasive sense of disconnect. By delving into the consequences of apathy in various contexts, from civic disengagement to its impact on community dynamics, we aim to uncover the ripple effects that extend far beyond individual experiences. As we navigate the delicate interplay between personal choices and societal implications, a nuanced understanding of the dangers of apathy emerges, urging us to consider the broader impact of our emotional states on the fabric of our communities.

Statistically, a rise in voter apathy in specific regions during recent elections signals a disconnect among individuals who feel disinterested or disillusioned with the political process. The mental health landscape has also seen an increase in feelings of apathy, particularly among younger generations, possibly linked to the multifaceted challenges posed by the global pandemic, sociopolitical uncertainties, and the climate emergency.

Emotionally, apathy leads to numbness or indifference, a void where passion once thrived. Psychologically, it can result from burnout, disillusionment, or a perception of helplessness, impacting mental health and overall life satisfaction. Behaviorally, apathetic individuals may withdraw from social interactions, avoiding responsibilities and displaying a general lack of initiative.

BLACK MIRRORS

What we watch, read and listen to speaks volumes about how we feel. The passions that resonate within the late millennial and Gen Z often have dominant themes of dystopia, resilience and rebellion. Cinematic narratives and auditory landscapes encapsulate the existential anxieties and aspirational dimensions of an epoch defined by the uncertainties and anxieties of a generation that came into a world facing climate crises, economic challenges, and social unrest.

From post-apocalyptic worlds to narratives exploring the consequences of unchecked power, dystopian themes echo the concerns and fears embedded in our collective consciousness. Hauntology, as theorized by Jacques Derrida and later expanded upon by cultural critics, adds another layer, suggesting that our narratives are haunted by a sense of the future that has eluded us—a future that appears distant and uncertain.

From protagonists defying oppressive systems to stories of social justice warriors, the theme of rebellion aligns with the desire for change and a refusal to accept the status quo. Hauntology, in this context, suggests that these narratives are not just about the present or the past; they are haunted by a future that feels inaccessible, pushing us to question and challenge existing structures in the pursuit of an alternative future.

The phenomenon of countless reboots in entertainment further underscores the hauntological perspective. In an era marked by uncertainty, the recurrence of familiar narratives and characters may be interpreted as an attempt to grapple with the absence of a clear future. Reboots, in their repetition, reflect a cultural yearning for a more familiar and perhaps more certain past— one revisited in the absence of a defined future.

As we immerse ourselves in these cultural narratives, we navigate a landscape haunted by the specter of an uncertain tomorrow. Hauntology provides a framework for understanding the complexities of our cultural choices, suggesting that our entertainment serves as both a reflection of our present concerns and a spectral exploration of a future that seems to elude our grasp. In the darkness of the cinema and the glow of our screens, we confront not only the fears and desires of the present, but also the ghosts of a future yet to unfold.

INVENTING THE FUTURE

In his book, Inventing the Future, Nick Srnicek meditates on the notion that advancements in technology, particularly automation and artificial intelligence, have the potential to liberate humanity from the drudgery of work. Giving more time and headspace to focus on enacting change in society.

 “Apathy is a symptom of a society that lacks a clear vision of the future. To combat apathy, we must articulate and work towards a transformative vision that captures the collective imagination.”

Srnicek urges us to confront the root cause of collective disengagement. It is an assertion that resonates deeply in an era marked by uncertainty, where societal currents often flow without a discernible destination. He proposes to break free from the inertia of established norms and envision a future where cultural, political and social institutions no longer perpetuate the malaise of disengagement. The status quo is not a fixed reality, but a malleable construct that demands scrutiny and reconstruction. Apathy is not an inherent trait, but a response to systems that fail to inspire or provide a compelling vision of the future.

Challenging the status quo implies a willingness to question deeply ingrained assumptions about how we organize and govern our societies. It prompts a reconsideration of cultural narratives, political structures, and social norms that may contribute to the prevailing sense of disillusionment.

To heed Srnicek’s call to action, we must embark on a journey of articulation and transformation. The onus lies not only on individuals, but on society as a whole to collectively imagine and articulate a vision of the future that transcends the status quo. In doing so, we confront the disquieting reality that the prevailing structures and systems may not be conducive to fostering a sense of purpose or shared destiny. This realization propels us into uncharted territory, demanding a deliberate and conscientious effort to redefine societal values, aspirations and trajectories.

After years of hoping for real change, many have become disenchanted with politics. It seems more about preserving the status quo than addressing the real issues affecting everyday people. The promise of transformative policies often gives way to a sense of stagnation, leaving citizens feeling unheard and disconnected from the political processes that shape their destinies.

The disillusionment with politics stems from a perceived lack of genuine commitment to addressing real, tangible issues. Instead of witnessing bold initiatives to tackle societal challenges, individuals often observe political maneuvers that prioritize partisan interests or short-term gains. This disillusionment is exacerbated by a growing sense of disconnection between the political elite and the concerns of ordinary citizens.

The prevailing sentiment echoes a desire for authentic representation and meaningful change, a yearning for politics to be a vehicle for societal progress rather than a mechanism for self-preservation. The result is a disheartened electorate, questioning the efficacy and authenticity of political systems that seem detached from the struggles and aspirations of those they are meant to serve.

WHAT NEXT?

In the evolving landscapes of work, society and culture, it becomes evident that our emotional responses are intertwined with the uncertainties of our time. While passion propels us towards meaningful goals, we must remember that which our passion is being directed towards and by whom. Dedication to meaningless jobs is only an act of self-preservation when one is frank about the unbelievably dire lack of credible alternatives.

We are the first generation to come into the world in a moment of global omnicrisis. Social, climate, economic — you name it, it’s fucked. The inability to own a home, find a job that one is passionate about coupled with the projection of unattainable lifestyles on social media and increasingly intense political environments across the board. Is it any wonder that the birth rate in the developed world is plummeting?

Though absolutely understandable, apathy poses a risk to societal engagement and well-being. It manifests in various forms, from political disinterest to personal withdrawal, creating a pervasive sense of disconnect that is self-reinforcing and genuinely worrying. The cultural choices we make, from entertainment preferences to the narratives we consume, are not mere reflections of our present, but haunted explorations of a worrying future.

As the writer, activist and holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel famously wrote:

“The opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it’s indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it’s indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it’s indifference.”

Passion is existential while apathy is manufactured.

]]>